Re: MD: ATRAC lossiness

2001-01-16 Thread Stainless Steel Rat
* "Howard Chu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 | about 4000 samples. So, it's been pretty much impossible for me to do a | direct bit-for-bit comparison of the ATRAC audio with the original WAV data. And useless, by the way. If you make a recording of a cricket chirping and a jumbo jet

MD: ATRAC lossiness

2001-01-15 Thread Howard Chu
Well, it was easy enough to compare ATRAC3 at 66, 105, and 132kbps to a WAV file. It was much harder to compare plain ATRAC since I couldn't get it directly onto my PC (yet). There appears to be too much jitter when playing back from my JB920 thru TOSlink into my Canopus MD-Port and into the PC

MD: ATRAC lossiness

2001-01-15 Thread Timothy Stockman
One of the problems of bit-for-bit comparison of a signal recorded by MD: I wonder if the problem could have to do with the sample-rate-converter in the MD? I've often had the nagging suspicion that the sample-rate-converter is not defeatable. My theory is that even when the input signal