RE: MD: MD Wins (was Re: Will MD Survive?).

2000-01-25 Thread Martin Schiff
I can connect through my cable modem at almost any time of the day or night to MP3.COM and get a 128K 44khz streaming playback in about 2 seconds without any stuttering or interruptions. It's not generally the server, it's your connection to the internet, or the routing between you and the server

Re: MD: MD Wins (was Re: Will MD Survive?).

2000-01-25 Thread Romain Kang
Don't forget that technology is evolving more rapidly than at any other time in recorded history. It wasn't so long ago that paying $1000 per megabyte of hard drive was a bargain, and related technologies have made similar advances in the same period. Today, $60 of CPU can encode MP3 in real ti

Re: MD: MD Wins (was Re: Will MD Survive?).

2000-01-25 Thread Mark Derricutt
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Magic wrote: > phones, I have yet to actually see a server on the internet that will output > an MP3 stream at a decent bitrate sustained long enough to play without > stuttering. My ISP has a mp3 stream at 128k 44khz which is pretty darn good, and using the satelite highsp

Re: MD: MD Wins (was Re: Will MD Survive?).

2000-01-25 Thread Ralph Smeets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 1/25/00 7:34:03 AM Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > /|\/|\ If they make mobile phones into portable music technology then this > will increase that health risk exponentially, as 1 or 2 minute calls turn > into 2 hour music li

Re: MD: MD Wins (was Re: Will MD Survive?).

2000-01-25 Thread ExquisiteDeadGuy
In a message dated 1/25/00 7:34:03 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: /|\/|\ If they make mobile phones into portable music technology then this will increase that health risk exponentially, as 1 or 2 minute calls turn into 2 hour music listening sessions. /|\/|\ To heck w

Re: MD: MD Wins (was Re: Will MD Survive?).

2000-01-25 Thread Ralph Smeets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > What worries me more is that this will essentially increase the number of > cases of cancer. We already know it to be a fact that prolonged use of > mobile phones, especially over prolonged periods of several minutes or more > at a time, is a large health risk. If th

Re: MD: MD Wins (was Re: Will MD Survive?).

2000-01-25 Thread Magic
From: Ralph Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 10:13 AM Subject: Re: MD: MD Wins (was Re: Will MD Survive?). > There is only one thing that wories me... Mobile phones and the > upcomming new standard > will allow us to list

Re: MD: MD Wins (was Re: Will MD Survive?).

2000-01-25 Thread Ralph Smeets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Ralph wrote: > > > There is only one thing that wories me... Mobile phones and the > > upcomming new standard > > will allow us to listen to MP3 music using our phone. It will allow us > > to connect to a > > site and listen to it! > > > At mobile phone rates ? List

RE: MD: MD Wins (was Re: Will MD Survive?).

2000-01-25 Thread Simon Barnes
Ralph wrote: > There is only one thing that wories me... Mobile phones and the > upcomming new standard > will allow us to listen to MP3 music using our phone. It will allow us > to connect to a > site and listen to it! > At mobile phone rates ? Listen to music while your brain fries ? Mmm Mmm

Re: MD: MD Wins (was Re: Will MD Survive?).

2000-01-25 Thread Ralph Smeets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sometime I think that those of us that have a PC automatically assume that > everyone else in the world has a PC too. Obviously this is not true, and while > the awareness of PC's has certainly risen to heady heights many people still > only use them at work or not at

MD: MD Wins (was Re: Will MD Survive?).

2000-01-25 Thread Guy Churchill
IMHO - MD and MP3 will survive but each will find it's own niche and there will be some overlap. MD = portable playback and record in a small package. MP3 = portable playback - no portable record (unless you have a laptop with a large HDD for WAV recording before encoding - or record at extreme