Re: MD: Md recorders smaller than the actual disc?

2001-08-28 Thread Gerard Naude
Point taken. So this basically means recorders like the sharp Mt770 recorder is as small as their going to get. Which is still actually pretty good... Gerard Naude Programmer - Universal Knowledge Software E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MD: Md recorders smaller than the actual disc?

2001-08-28 Thread Gerard Naude
Yeah. Let's face it, MD players/recorders look goood... - Original Message - From: Mike Lastucka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:31 PM Subject: Re: MD: Md recorders smaller than the actual disc? Personally I find MD players/recorders

Re: MD: Md recorders smaller than the actual disc?

2001-08-27 Thread David W. Tamkin
Gerald wrote, | I was just wondering when md recorders are going to become smaller than | the actual disc. In theory only half of the disc needs to be covered by | the MD recorder(to reach the middle of the md to turn it, and to cover the | disc opening). Are current MD recorder sizes

Re: MD: Md recorders smaller than the actual disc?

2001-08-27 Thread Mike Lastucka
PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Md-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MD: Md recorders smaller than the actual disc? Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:15:43 +0200 I was just wondering when md recorders are going to become smaller than the actual disc. In theory only half of the disc needs to be covered

Re: MD: Md recorders smaller than the actual disc?

2001-08-27 Thread las
Gerard Naude wrote: I was just wondering when md recorders are going to become smaller than the actual disc. In theory only half of the disc needs to be covered by the MD recorder(to reach the middle of the md to turn it, and to cover the disc opening). Are current MD recorder sizes