Re: MD: Re: Circuit City Responds

2000-04-11 Thread Matt White
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Dan Frakes wrote: > The basics of my relatively modest home stereo, averaging seven years old > (it was bought one piece at a time), are the following: $200 speaker > system (PSB), $300 amp (NAD), $250 CD player (NAD). That's a $750 system > -- not a Circuit City shelf s

Re: MD: Re: Circuit City Responds

2000-04-11 Thread Matt Wall
April 10, 2000 1:42 PM Subject: Re: MD: Re: Circuit City Responds > > Enno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >That's exactly the point. Of course you can *measure* a difference > >between CD an minidisc, because minidisc audio is compressed an CD > >audio is not. But m

Re: MD: Re: Circuit City Responds

2000-04-10 Thread Dan Frakes
Enno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >That's exactly the point. Of course you can *measure* a difference >between CD an minidisc, because minidisc audio is compressed an CD >audio is not. But most of the people cannot *hear* that measurable >difference, because that's what psychoacoustic coding is

Re: MD: Re: Circuit City Responds

2000-04-10 Thread Tony Keogh
ssage - From: Enno Lübbers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 13:49 Subject: Re: MD: Re: Circuit City Responds > > > Is it possible to scientifically measure the difference in sound quality > > between a CD and an MD? All these clai

Re: MD: Re: Circuit City Responds

2000-04-10 Thread Enno Lübbers
> Is it possible to scientifically measure the difference in sound quality > between a CD and an MD? All these claims made by "golden" ears who can > hear the difference between a CD and an MD may be purely subjective to > personal tastes. That's exactly the point. Of course you can *measure* a