Re: MD: headphones impedance vs battery life / yet another MS722 review

2000-03-27 Thread Ralph Smeets
=== = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please = = be more selective when quoting text = === [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Mar 20

RE: MD: headphones impedance vs battery life / yet another MS722 review

2000-03-27 Thread Simon Barnes
Francisco Jose Montilla wrote: > I meant (sorry, english isn't my native language) that > what excite the headphone transducers is a variable (AC) electrical > signal. I don't have the mathematical demonstration handy, but if you go > in a little deeper, you'll notice that

Re: MD: headphones impedance vs battery life / yet another MS722 review

2000-03-26 Thread Francisco Jose Montilla
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, J. Coon wrote: Hi, > > BTW, I don't see http://home.worldonline.dk/~isl366/md/md.htm > > listed on the construction projects section on minidisc.org (although I'd > > swear I got that link from somewhere related to minidisc.org. > > THis set up will only re

Re: MD: headphones impedance vs battery life / yet another MS722 review

2000-03-26 Thread J. Coon
Francisco Jose Montilla wrote: > > Well, U=I*R. U can't change!! So if you increase R, you decrease I. > > P=U*I, U doesn't change, but I get's smaller. Thus lower power consumption. > > Not with variable AC... Ok, here is the problem You are driving the head phone through an outpu

Re: MD: headphones impedance vs battery life / yet another MS722 review

2000-03-26 Thread J. Coon
Francisco Jose Montilla wrote: > BTW, I don't see http://home.worldonline.dk/~isl366/md/md.htm > listed on the construction projects section on minidisc.org (although I'd > swear I got that link from somewhere related to minidisc.org. THis set up will only record mono. The one I designe

Re: MD: headphones impedance vs battery life / yet another MS722 review

2000-03-25 Thread Francisco Jose Montilla
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Ralph Smeets wrote: Hi! > than a year...) The only portable that won't break and that is Sony is my > CMC-Z1+ portable GSM phone... (of which most consumer magazines write you > that the flip-down microphone will break very quickly...) BTW, I don't see h

RE: MD: headphones impedance vs battery life / yet another MS722 review

2000-03-24 Thread Francisco Jose Montilla
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Simon Barnes wrote: Hi, > Francisco Jose Montilla wrote: (in reply to Jim Coon) > > > That doesn't happen in the amp/transducer world, AFAIK. Here > > weren't working with DC, is variable Hz AC, and what > > Sorry Francisco, I'm having a lot of difficulty

Re: MD: headphones impedance vs battery life / yet another MS722 review

2000-03-23 Thread Ralph Smeets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi! > > I'm the happy owner now of a Sharp MS-722. All other MD equipment > I have is Sony. But this time I saw very clear that Sony wasn't > competitive in this area; first, slot-in mechanism is far more robust than > the clam-shell one, second batt

RE: MD: headphones impedance vs battery life / yet another MS722 review

2000-03-23 Thread Simon Barnes
Francisco Jose Montilla wrote: (in reply to Jim Coon) > That doesn't happen in the amp/transducer world, AFAIK. Here > weren't working with DC, is variable Hz AC, and what Sorry Francisco, I'm having a lot of difficulty in understanding what you are trying to say. Jim's equation works

Re: MD: headphones impedance vs battery life / yet another MS722 review

2000-03-23 Thread Francisco Jose Montilla
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, J. Coon wrote: Hi, > > Here's were my question comes: Sharp headphones are 32 Ohm, I have > > an old walkman Aiwa headphones whose sound I like too much (in fact i > > tried lots of walkmans back then to find the better sounding ones). But > > they're 200 Oh

Re: MD: headphones impedance vs battery life / yet another MS722 review

2000-03-22 Thread J. Coon
Francisco Jose Montilla wrote: > Here's were my question comes: Sharp headphones are 32 Ohm, I have > an old walkman Aiwa headphones whose sound I like too much (in fact i > tried lots of walkmans back then to find the better sounding ones). But > they're 200 Ohm. > > My electron