On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 08:36:43AM -0400, Richard Lowe wrote:
> "max at bruningsystems.com" writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > John Levon wrote:
> >> To my mind, maintaining some level of compatibility is useful in itself.
> >> mdb.eng's mdb wrapper notwithstanding, it can still be troublesome.
> >>
> >>
> It seems to me that if we made use of the onnv_XX tags that
> have been going into the Mercurial clone for a while, then
> it shouldn't be too hard to regenerate the per-build mdb dmods
> and usr/bin/$ISADIR/mdb command.
The scripts extract the dmods from the bfu archives for each build.
Since
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:56:12AM +1000, James C. McPherson wrote:
> Mike Shapiro wrote:
> >
> >>It seems to me that if we made use of the onnv_XX tags that
> >>have been going into the Mercurial clone for a while, then
> >>it shouldn't be too hard to regenerate the per-build mdb dmods
> >>and us
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:56:12AM +1000, James C. McPherson wrote:
> Mike Shapiro wrote:
> >
> >> It seems to me that if we made use of the onnv_XX tags that
> >> have been going into the Mercurial clone for a while, then
> >> it shouldn't be too hard to regenerate the per-build mdb dmods
> >> a
