I run a wiki an order of magnitude larger than yours on a 2GB Linode. You
should have no issue on a $20/mo 512MB Linode provided you're running a
modern PHP stack.
My recommendation is NGINX, PHP-FPM with APC and the built-in mediawiki
file cache. If you're not getting the performance you want you
I was running mediawiki on a Shared host and traffic was around 10K views a
day (small to moderate size wiki). I was forced to leave that setup because
of high CPU usage. I was not able to install Squid there or do anything to
speed things up. I had talked about that before on this list and I'm
tha
On Thursday, November 29th, between 21:00-22:00 UTC (1-2pm PST)
Wikimedia Foundation will release security updates for current and
supported branches of the MediaWiki software. We are providing this
pre-announcement as a courtesy for administrators to be ready to
accept the fix for these on Thursda
On 26 November 2012 17:18, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
> On 11/26/2012 12:14 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
>> That wouldn't be the solution of the tarball problem you are describing
>> but it would be really useful for the majority of MW admins having to
>> search for extensions *after* they miss something.
Congratulations, Yaron!
___
MediaWiki-l mailing list
MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
On 26/11/12 16:47, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> I've partly refactored the page in the past and most (or all)
> suggestions there are still relevant and up to date.
>
> Nemo
I saw a few changes, but seems odd to argue with 2009 comments (or even
2008). New proposals mixed with old stuff.
Going back to your mention of preapproving edits - would it be straightforward
to have an extension hook check to see if a certain "protected" section was
edited by comparing it to the previous revision?
From: Arcane 21
To: alj62...@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday,
Thanks Arcane, you touched on another question I had; protecting certain
portions of a page from edit. Is there seriously no way to do this at all that
isn't a hack? This would be a deal-breaker, unfortunately. Any suggestions
for other wikis?
Thanks,
Al
Thanks Stephan, but FWIW I was talking about the layout of the finished page,
not during editing. Thanks for the links.
From: Stephan Gambke
To: Al Johnson ; MediaWiki announcements and site admin
list
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:10 AM
Subject: Re:
Hi Al,
it depends on how much you want to enforce this.
Semantic Forms will always include the structured data at the top and
the free text at the bottom of the page. So if your preferred spot for
the semantic stuff is at the top, you'll be alright. If you want it to
be anywhere else, it becomes
Hi, this is a newbie question; thanks in advance.
I'm thinking about using SMW with MW. I'll use Semantic Forms and the like to
make entering the semantic data easier and then let editors enter free text for
other miscellaneous sections. But, the semantic stuff is the most important
and I wan
11 matches
Mail list logo
