This list is for the Mediawiki software itself and has nothing to do with
Wiki-Site.com operations.
You will have to reach out to Wiki-Site.com for your answers. I know that’s
not a great answer here but we unfortunately can’t help.
-George
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 19, 2023, at 9:50 A
Bexafe4967 has ignored several explanations that he?s talking to the wrong people. What?s the list moderation policy???-george Sent from my iPhoneOn Oct 5, 2023, at 4:22 PM, Anpang wrote:?I thought I'd get MW updates and not whatever these are?On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 10:59 PM
Why? Space is rarely an issue...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 4, 2016, at 12:38 PM, Mickey Feldman wrote:
>
> I have been looking for an extension or process to remove all revisions of
> pages "older than _date_" or "all but the last _n_", but have not found
> anythin
There is some access control possibility, by giving certain namespaces or
articles specific group requirements to view. Only grant privileged users
those groups needed to read or edit the secure docs.
Alternatively, create two parallel wikis, one of which is open internal
access having the non-sec
If it was a link to a .ly URL, those are a virus hacking people's PCs
and mailing address books, not a spammer lurking...
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Al Johnson wrote:
> I just got spammed with the email impostering another user of this forum I
> recently exchanged email with.
> __
On Oct 30, 2012, at 12:12 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 29 October 2012 23:56, Dave Humphrey wrote:
>
>> As a rough guess at what to set MaxClients to use "top" and look at the
>> difference between the RES and SHR columns of all httpd processes. I
>> believe this is roughly the amount of no
As one option...
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:37 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>>> So second thing we need to work out what our next stage of evolution
>>> is (the 8GB Linode for $200/mo more? [2] or multiple servers?
>
>> Not really knowledgeable in this area but 200/month does seem a tad
>> expensive, H
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:36 PM, wrote:
> I know
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Installation_requirements...
>
> Let's say I have 20 medium sized wiki pages. Medium sized defined by
> wikipedia definitions, normal articles, not too much.
>
> I expect having 10 to 100 viewers and maximum 5
On first inspection - I think that something went wrong with your
database, and its lost some data.
The software can connect to it, but the MediaWiki data doesn't seem to be in it.
Check your MySQL database and see if it got corrupted or dropped data...
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Jack S
To explain briefly -
MediaWiki uses what's known as a mail server - either a local or
remote server which will accept server to server email connections.
This is completely unlike Gmail or Hotmail or those things - those are
mail clients you use, to access someone else's server.
Your ISP would h
On the followup question - yes. You need to have the landing pad
"main page" visible to anyone, but you can create a group memberships
structure with a custom group that keeps anyone from accessing content
unless you approve them. That isn't super-secure, but gets you
reasonably far towards a sec
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:38:17 +0200, Platonides
>> wrote:
>
> > Uwe Brauer wrote:
> >> most of the files are very small in size with the
> >> exception of searchindex.MYD and searchindex.MYI. I
> >> have no idea whether this is
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello
>
> This is a real nightmare. A Mac crashed, the hard disk could
> be saved. Right now it can't be booted. That hard disk contained
> the wiki of our department.
>
> I don't know precisely the version of the OS (most likely Mac X
>
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:47 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 17 August 2010 17:54, Graham wrote:
>
>> So I guess there isn't any possibility to have a group of users assigned
>> to a Namespace, and the other users status quo.
>> The owner of the wiki doesn't want another one to administer, so that'
Not without some effort - MediaWiki's access control stuff leaves
something to be desired for some apps.
However, one can cheat. Create a namespace for the summary - similar
to Talk - and give the summary-only users edit permissions to the
summary (or alternately, summary and talk) namespaces but
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Henny Savenije
wrote:
> No but if you have two servers and on both servers the wiki is under
> the same domain name the only thing you have to do is regularly copy
> all the files and databases to the other server (not in use) if one
> goes down you will have to cha
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Robert Hagens wrote:
> Are there special semantics associated with a user name such that if there
> is an at sign, mediawiki assumes different properties about the user? For
> example, if I have a user 'a...@b.c' and I try to edit that user's rights, I
> get an err
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Andrew Thornton <
andrew.thorn...@thorntonindustries.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have a squid 3.0 configuration file that they would not mind
> sharing? With round robin?
>
(not a config file, but...)
If you're going to use it at all, use 3.0-STABLE11 at least - the
The file type is .xlsx rather than .xls, that might help...
-george
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Dave Sigafoos wrote:
> That is probably it. How would it be set for 1.10?
>
> DSig
> David Tod Sigafoos | SANMAR Corporation
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: mediawiki-l-boun...@lis
Transcluded pages, and locked transclusion sources, do this just fine.
If you control the server you can set up a group security mechanism and put
the auto-generated pages in their own namespace, which only a few users can
edit, so you don't even have to mess with per-page permission stuff...
O
20 matches
Mail list logo