On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 06:40, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> There are no big players left in MeeGo. No popular phone or tablet.
Well, I do wish this becomes popular
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003JFKUWQ?ie=UTF8&tag=showitem06-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B003JFKUWQ
FC
__
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 06:40, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> There are no big players left in MeeGo. No popular phone or tablet.
Well, I do plan on buying the new MeeGo powered Asus x101 intel x86 netbook.
I know, you're probably talking about ARM devices...
FC
__
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:00, pasi nieminen wrote:
> From our perspective this is extension to MeeGo.
>
> regs, Pasi
>From my perspective, then, you guys suck at communication. Because
that is not the message the rest of the world+dog will get. In fact,
I'm sure headlines are making the rounds a
2011/8/3 Cláudio Sampaio :
> I think Nokia should consider using this program to reach not only
> application developers, but system administrators, heavy users,
> documentation writers and artists.
Not to mention tech journalists in South America with a great interest
in MeeGo from the N800 days,
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:57, Sunny B wrote:
> The article that started this is not clear.
So if any project leader or other "Official voice of MeeGo" wants to
give your side to the story (or non-story) I´m all ears.
Please do e-mail me. There´s a chance to set the record straight. I
imagine a Q
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 21:20, Henri Bergius wrote:
> Actually, the freedom of defining your own user interface is big
> enough that both Android and WebOS could theoretically be rebased on
> top of MeeGo to be just different MeeGo UXs. Obviously they would need
> to allow running MeeGo-compliant Q
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 09:32, Carsten Munk wrote:
> I'm wondering where that comes from, in sites such as
> http://www.techeye.net/mobile/meego-will-be-dead-in-eight-months
>
> (Yes, this is the same site as in
> http://www.techeye.net/software/nokias-meego-is-doomed )
I work for techEye.net as a
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Rodrigo Padula
wrote:
> The Fedora project isnt interested to fix that or to stay distributing
> Fedora Meego Remix as a official internal project.
>
> I've filed a but and reported the problems here
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613411 but it was cl
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:56 AM, David Greaves wrote:
> So Nokia has dramatically reduced commitment to MeeGo and has cited, amongst
> other thinks, MeeGo's inability to deliver a focussed baseline with
> sufficient speed.
I own a Nokia N800 Internet Tablet, it runs Maemo and Linux. It was
releas
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Gary Birkett wrote:
> I have tried numerous IDEs and experience and to date have not seen a more
> polished core engineering effort than vb6 :)
Visual Basic is Windows-Only. The future is not WIndows... it´s mixed
windows-Linux environments.
That´s why I suggest y
Is Nokia´s commitment to MeeGo at risk??
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703597204575482902836750116.html?mod=WSJ_article_MoreIn_Tech
FC
___
MeeGo-community mailing list
MeeGo-community@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-comm
Okay, where is the download link to get a fresh install of 1.0.2 ??
I´ve been going in circless between the download page, which lists
1.0, and the 1.0.2 update page, which provides rlease notes but no
download link
FC
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Wang, Ning W wrote:
> Today, we are ann
12 matches
Mail list logo
