Re: [MeeGo-dev] [PATCH] Fix ARM N900 build

2010-04-22 Thread Roger Quadros
ext An Yang wrote: 在 2010-04-21三的 08:04 -0700,Greg KH写道: As someone who has maintained kernels with a few dozen config files for a long time, for different arches and flavors, no, this seems much easier to keep everything in sync properly. Let's try it and see, individual config files are very

[MeeGo-dev] [PATCH v2] Fix ARM N900 build

2010-04-22 Thread Roger Quadros
Fixes OBS build for ARM N900. This will not affect existing x86 or x86_64 builds. v2: - ensures 'make nonint_oldconfig' is run for all variants during build. Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros --- kernel.spec.in | 79 makespec.pl|2 +-

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-22 Thread Glen Gray
Guys, Please don't hijack threads On 22 Apr 2010, at 06:48, An Yang wrote: > 在 2010-04-22四的 13:41 +0800,An Yang写道: >> 在 2010-04-21三的 21:09 -0700,Greg KH写道: >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:58:41AM +0800, An Yang wrote: >>> > > > yes, I'm one of them-:) >>> > > > But more stable more user, it

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-22 Thread Glen Gray
On 22 Apr 2010, at 00:26, wrote: > I am not sure exactly what you are after, but the plan is for Meego to have a > 6month release cycle, so May-November-May. We can probably expect some > variations from this cycle, but every 6months is the intention. > You're confusing a product release wi

[MeeGo-dev] Is the liveinst issue solved?

2010-04-22 Thread 崔战伟
Hi, I want to install meego on a pc, but boot-and-install say can not find /usr/sbin/liveinst. How to do next ? Terry ___ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Re: [MeeGo-dev] LTS [was Projected timelines for full openness]

2010-04-22 Thread Glen Gray
Please start you on thread guys. On 22 Apr 2010, at 10:45, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On 22/04/2010 06:05, An Yang wrote: >>> Meego is a project hosted by the Linux Foundation, and while companies can >>> use it to make projects, it is not a company. The goal of the Meego >>> project is to ma

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-22 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On 22/04/2010 06:05, An Yang wrote: >> Meego is a project hosted by the Linux Foundation, and while companies can >> use it to make projects, it is not a company. The goal of the Meego project >> is to make an "open" project, and to make use of open technologies (like >> gstreamer) where people

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-22 Thread Robin Burchell
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Glen Gray wrote: > To follow up on the topic of openness and transparency from the TSG meeting > earlier today, I'd like to ask for some details and timelines for when this > is planned to be achieved. [ignoring the detour into LTS to keep things on topic] Agr

[MeeGo-dev] Brief status of "MeeGo to N900" project

2010-04-22 Thread harri.hakulinen
Hello MeeGos ! This is brief status update of "MeeGo to N900" project. This project is currently running as Nokia project, and I am Nokia project lead for it. The current closed mode of development is not the target for us at all, but rather transitional condition. As already discussed by Valt

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Brief status of "MeeGo to N900" project

2010-04-22 Thread Glen Gray
On 22 Apr 2010, at 15:07, wrote: > > Hello MeeGos ! > > This is brief status update of "MeeGo to N900" project. This project is > currently running as Nokia project, and I am Nokia project lead for it. The > current closed mode of development is not the target for us at all, but > rathe

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [PATCH] Fix ARM N900 build

2010-04-22 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 4/22/2010 0:08, Roger Quadros wrote: ext An Yang wrote: � 2010-04-21�� 08:04 -0700�Greg KH��� As someone who has maintained kernels with a few dozen config files for a long time, for different arches and flavors, no, this seems much easier to keep everything in sync properly.

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Brief status of "MeeGo to N900" project

2010-04-22 Thread Linuxguy123
I am very happy to read this. I give Nokia a standing ovation for the commitment and effort I read about in your email. Why doesn't Nokia communicate information like this on a more regular basis ? Thanks LG ___ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@me

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-22 Thread Jonas Eckerman
On 2010-04-22 05:40, Greg KH wrote: [about long term support] But more stable more user, it's a good rule of any success products, no mater software or hardware, even none IT related products. Then under that rule, Linux would not be a success. I think you need to rethink your "rules" :)

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-22 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Glen Gray wrote: > You're confusing a product release with openness. By openness I mean > code available, for me to download, compile and work on. Some code was > released for Day 1 as regards the base operating system but the project > is still largely being designed and developed behind clos

[MeeGo-dev] polkit-auth command not found

2010-04-22 Thread Bullokles, Cristian
Hi, I'd like to use polkit-auth command but it's not available at MeeGo but in Moblin 2.1 was available within the PolicyKit package. It will be included in meego or I'll need to look for a workaround? Regards Cristian ___ MeeGo-dev mailing list M

[MeeGo-dev] Booting IA 32 MeeGo without real mode int 13 BIOS support

2010-04-22 Thread Picard, Tom S
Is it possible to boot (and install) Meego on an Atom Platform with UEFI compatible BIOS, without the real mode dos (int 13) compatibility layer? I am working with a BIOS vendor and would like to do this in order to accomplish fast boot for an InVehicle Infotainment platform Thanks tompicard .

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Booting IA 32 MeeGo without real mode int 13 BIOS support

2010-04-22 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 4/22/2010 12:14, Picard, Tom S wrote: Is it possible to boot (and install) Meego on an Atom Platform with UEFI compatible BIOS, without the real mode dos (int 13) compatibility layer? the netbook builds do not have UEFI support currently. this is not a fundamental limitation of "MeeGo" but m

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Booting IA 32 MeeGo without real mode int 13 BIOS support

2010-04-22 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:14:36PM -0700, Picard, Tom S wrote: > Is it possible to boot (and install) Meego on an Atom Platform with > UEFI compatible BIOS, without the real mode dos (int 13) compatibility > layer? > > I am working with a BIOS vendor and would like to do this in order to > accompl

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Brief status of "MeeGo to N900" project

2010-04-22 Thread Warren Baird
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:07 AM, wrote: > > Hello MeeGos ! > > This is brief status update of "MeeGo to N900" project. This project is > currently running as Nokia project, and I am Nokia project lead for it. The > current closed mode of development is not the target for us at all, but > rather

[MeeGo-dev] meego netbook repo AWOL

2010-04-22 Thread Robison, Clayne B
Anyone know where the meego netbook yum repo went? In build 2010-04-20, it was supposed to be at http://repo.meego.com/MeeGo/devel/netbook/repo/ia32/os there is no 'netbook' folder under 'devel'. Thanks.   Clayne Robison Application Engineer Intel Corporation Phoenix, AZ 480.552.5309   "Perhap

Re: [MeeGo-dev] meego netbook repo AWOL

2010-04-22 Thread Glen Gray
Hey Clayne, Unfortunately, it's never been made publicly available, even though there's publicly hosted kickstart files that reference it. I logged a bug on this on the 12th and it's been assigned. http://bugzilla.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652 On 22 Apr 2010, at 22:23, Robison, Clayne B wrote:

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Brief status of "MeeGo to N900" project

2010-04-22 Thread Sebastian Lauwers
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote: > I am very happy to read this. It is indeed a pretty good announcement. > Why doesn't Nokia communicate information like this on a more regular > basis ? I doubt that it is very respectful to ask a senior manager to publicly discuss the corpo

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Booting IA 32 MeeGo without real mode int 13 BIOS support

2010-04-22 Thread Picard, Tom S
Greg, Arjan, Thanks for advice, after further discussion with BIOS engineer, It is NOT that I/this project explicitly require UEFI. What we require is that the Linux bootloader (grub or whatever MeeGo uses (I know Moblin used Grub)) NOT have transitioned into 16 bit real mode when it, calls BIO

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Booting IA 32 MeeGo without real mode int 13 BIOS support

2010-04-22 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 4/22/2010 15:09, Picard, Tom S wrote: Greg, Arjan, Thanks for advice, after further discussion with BIOS engineer, It is NOT that I/this project explicitly require UEFI. What we require is that the Linux bootloader (grub or whatever MeeGo uses (I know Moblin used Grub)) NOT have transitione

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Booting IA 32 MeeGo without real mode int 13 BIOS support

2010-04-22 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 04/22/2010 03:10 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 4/22/2010 15:09, Picard, Tom S wrote: >> Greg, Arjan, >> >> Thanks for advice, after further discussion with BIOS engineer, >> It is NOT that I/this project explicitly require UEFI. >> >> What we require is that the Linux bootloader (grub or what

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Booting IA 32 MeeGo without real mode int 13 BIOS support

2010-04-22 Thread madskaddie
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:47 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > There are currently two boot loaders which can boot Linux from native > EFI/UEFI: ELILO and the Fedora/RedHat fork of Grub.  However, arguably > the best thing would be to have a program that wrapped a Linux kernel > plus an EFI boot stub i

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Brief status of "MeeGo to N900" project

2010-04-22 Thread Kasi Viswanath
A great start to the day. Thanks Harri. And thanks for not forgetting the good old tablets :) N8x0 devices are amazing too... Regards, Kasi (@vkvraju) On 23 April 2010 03:10, Sebastian Lauwers wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Linuxguy123 > wrote: > > I am very happy to read this. > >

[MeeGo-dev] test to meego-dev list 4/22/2010

2010-04-22 Thread Randall Arnold
test to meego-dev list 4/22/2010 Randall (Randy) Arnold maemo.org community council http://tabulacrypticum.wordpress.com/ -- Ovi Mail: Create an account directly from your phone http://mail.ovi.com __

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-22 Thread An Yang
Hi Gray, I just want you know the meaning of stable and openness, I think all of meego guys should know it. And of cause, if you want to discuss cpu and other, please email me directly. 在 2010-04-22四的 10:03 +0100,Glen Gray写道: > Guys, > > Please don't hijack threads > > On 22 Apr 2010, at 06:4

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Brief status of "MeeGo to N900" project

2010-04-22 Thread An Yang
Thanks nokia guys. it a great news. 在 2010-04-23五的 07:12 +0530,Kasi Viswanath写道: > A great start to the day. Thanks Harri. > > > > And thanks for not forgetting the good old tablets :) N8x0 devices are > amazing too... > > > Regards, > Kasi (@vkvraju) > > > On 23 April 2010 03:10, Sebastia

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Brief status of "MeeGo to N900" project

2010-04-22 Thread Narayana Aadi
hey dont distrub me with ur mails y ___ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Brief status of "MeeGo to N900" project

2010-04-22 Thread Sebastian Lauwers
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Narayana Aadi wrote: > hey dont distrub me with ur mails y Feel free to unsubscribe from the meego-dev mailing list if it is too noisy for you. http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev -- question = ( to ) ? be : ! be; -- Wm. Shakespeare