[MeeGo-dev] AMD Joins MeeGo

2010-11-15 Thread ksh shrm
Hi All, AMD joins MeeGo! http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/15/amd-will-contribute-engineering-expertise-to-meego-development/ will that bring support to AMD Neo based on SSE3? I just can't wait to see meego running on every netbook. -aakash ___ MeeGo-de

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Is there any way to rotate Meego SDK emulator from landscape model to portrait

2010-11-15 Thread jalbrizio
Thanks this did it for me. Quoted from LiJianzhong "For emulator, ctrl + shift + alt + r can rotate the screen to portrait" -- View this message in context: http://meego-dev.390449.n3.nabble.com/MeeGo-dev-Is-there-any-way-to-rotate-Meego-SDK-emulator-from-landscape-model-to-portrait-tp1398970p

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Question about browser engine

2010-11-15 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 04:44:57PM +0800, Chen Dai wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a question about browser engine. > > Why MeeGo use two different browser engines, Webkit/Chromium for > netbook, Gecko/Fennec for handset? > > Why not use one browser engine for all device? Please read the archives,

[MeeGo-dev] Question about browser engine

2010-11-15 Thread Chen Dai
Hi all, I have a question about browser engine. Why MeeGo use two different browser engines, Webkit/Chromium for netbook, Gecko/Fennec for handset? Why not use one browser engine for all device? Thanks Chen ___ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Handset UX rotation -- how is it implemented?

2010-11-15 Thread Hämäläinen Kimmo
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 22:52 +0100, ext Javier S. Pedro wrote: > 2010/11/13 Carsten Munk : > > I've actually heard the opposite argument - not using xrandr for > > performance reasons. As it's faster to rotate a surface with the > > application on with GL/GLES than with xrandr. > > Well, what I see

Re: [MeeGo-dev] QWidget::showEvent might be helpful for apps wanting to know if they should keep drawing.

2010-11-15 Thread Hämäläinen Kimmo
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 21:01 +0100, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Friday, 12 de November de 2010 20:09:04 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > can we get some urgency on solving this? adding events for "you're > > visible" and "you're not visible" ? > > It's a huge deal for power / thermal savings. >