Hi Sivan,
Sivan Greenberg wrote:
I really liked the use of the median to conclude Prof. Knuth has not
done much of maintainer-ship over Tex the last couple of years, but
your account felt a bit too philosophical to me. But then again it is
late for me, and this is probably my own subjective
Hi (ARM toolchain group mostly)
Do we have a patch for glibc-2.11-12-g24c0bf7 and/or glibc-2.12.1 that
enables ARM RunFast[1] mode by default anywhere? Would be good to push
it along with hardfp while we're at it and getting things tested
through.
Best regards,
Carsten Munk
[1]
Yes, we have. Juha could provide it. The best outcome: using standard glibc
interface we could turn it to FAST/IEEE mode
_FPU_SETCW(_FPU_IEEE);
Turning back to run fast could be done by
_FPU_SETCW(_FPU_DEFAULT);
No problems discovered during testing.
With best wishes,
Leonid
Here's a patch to arm build of eglibc 2.10 that does it. I had to modify
some packages to pass their testsuites. One of the packages was mpfr, the
float tests will fail with RunFast mode.
In arm case the _FPU_IEEE mode is different from the default mode, which
does not have the FPU exceptions
I have impression that fpu_control.h has the same interface for all HW
platforms, so conditional compilation is not required.
With best wishes,
Leonid
-Original Message-
From: Kallioinen Juha (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)
Sent: 12 January, 2011 11:35
To: Moiseichuk Leonid (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)
It could be so. I tried to call _FPU_SETCW(0), since that's what the old
_FPU_DEFAULT was. That fails with i386, maybe I should have used the macro
definition like _FPU_IEEE instead.
-Juha
On 12/01/11 11:42, Moiseichuk Leonid (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) wrote:
I have impression that fpu_control.h
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Dave Neary dne...@maemo.org wrote:
re. Core should not be exempt: if we look at Debian, you can't become a
maintainer of a package unless the maintainer(s) invite you to be, or
the package is abandoned. I don't think any core packages will be
abandoned any
Hi,
Sivan Greenberg wrote:
What if I want to change something or add functionality to an existing
package?
Then you should go through the submission process of the upstream (code)
project. This is why I make a clear distinction between package
maintainers (who ensure the latest software is
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Dave Neary dne...@maemo.org wrote:
You will need to presumably open some smaller-granularity bugs
(Increase corner and edge target sizes on windows for touch events,
for example), against the appropriate module. Now, I don't know exactly
what is involved, but
Hi,
Sivan Greenberg wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Dave Neary dne...@maemo.org wrote:
Concretely, this is what working upstream actually means.
So given this alleged time frame (I'm thinking out loud, and I thank
you greatly for this discussion, albeit a bit off topic now to
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Dave Neary dne...@maemo.org wrote:
It seems your pointer [0] is uninitialised...
[0]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cupsys/+bug/8975
It is indeed quite small change, but not just a configuration and
theme change but proper glade file and C code
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Dave Neary dne...@maemo.org wrote:
Hi,
Sivan Greenberg wrote:
What if I want to change something or add functionality to an existing
package?
Then you should go through the submission process of the upstream (code)
project. This is why I make a clear
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Dave Neary dne...@maemo.org wrote:
Hi,
Sivan Greenberg wrote:
What if I want to change something or add functionality to an existing
package?
Then you should go through the submission process of the upstream (code)
project. This is why I make a clear
On 1/12/2011 1:06 AM, Carsten Munk wrote:
Hi (ARM toolchain group mostly)
Do we have a patch for glibc-2.11-12-g24c0bf7 and/or glibc-2.12.1 that
enables ARM RunFast[1] mode by default anywhere? Would be good to push
it along with hardfp while we're at it and getting things tested
through.
can
2011/1/12 Arjan van de Ven ar...@linux.intel.com:
On 1/12/2011 1:06 AM, Carsten Munk wrote:
Hi (ARM toolchain group mostly)
Do we have a patch for glibc-2.11-12-g24c0bf7 and/or glibc-2.12.1 that
enables ARM RunFast[1] mode by default anywhere? Would be good to push
it along with hardfp
(cross-posting from meego-pm, let's carry on discussion there)
Hello,
I have corrected the issue of missing wiki for PM function, by creating a page
and linked it also to main page: http://wiki.meego.com/Product_Management. The
wiki is (of course) a work in progress, and missing stuff.
One of
On Wednesday, 12 de January de 2011 16:01:31 Carsten Munk wrote:
2011/1/12 Arjan van de Ven ar...@linux.intel.com:
On 1/12/2011 1:06 AM, Carsten Munk wrote:
Hi (ARM toolchain group mostly)
Do we have a patch for glibc-2.11-12-g24c0bf7 and/or glibc-2.12.1 that
enables ARM RunFast[1]
Hi,
I have seen that we can create package (.rpm using .spec file) and then
create meego image using this package and the package(using KichStart file).
But I am getting the below error when I have tried to create .rpm package.
$r...@ubuntu:/home/mkaran/Meego Source/meego-os-base/kernel-source#
Hi,
I have tried to create one local build setup in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS by two
ways, One the local build without OBS(
http://wiki.meego.com/Local_Build_Without_OBS_Needed ) and second Build
using OBS (
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_private_installation).
Steps for build without OBS.
Hi,
Does anyone know the current state of multi-touch on MeeGo 1.1.80 builds?
I noticed in this slide 15 of this presentation -
(http://conference2010.meego.com/sites/all/files/sessions/meego-conference-2010-multi-point-touch.odp),
the stack is presumably different for MeeGo 1.2 than MeeGo
As I remember, Xorg -configure does not generate the correct xorg.conf for
Oaktrail, I edited the config file to use pvr driver instead. FYI.
Best Regards,
Tonny
-Original Message-
From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [mailto:meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] On
Behalf Of Zhao, Juan J
Sent:
-Original Message-
From: Tzeng, Tonny
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 8:36 AM
To: Zhao, Juan J; tang.xin...@byd.com; Liu, Xinyun
Cc: MeeGo-dev@meego.com; meego-ker...@lists.meego.com
Subject: RE: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-kernel] Can't run Meego at Intel New
platform oak trail !!
As
Hi all:
I want to share some messages for Usbmoded.
It is that Usbmoded will not be part be MeeGo 1.2. Its functions will reply
the other components.
Thank you and best regards
Zheng wu
Some of the related packages changes already enter Trunk repos, while Qt
patches haven't be merged to Trunk yet.
There are two MeeGo bugs related to this AFAIK you can have a reference:
1) FEA#11254 Packages required to support touch for 1.2
http://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11254
2)
Hi all,
How can i get access to meego OBS, i want to set up the meego build
infrastructure, is there any formal way to go about getting the same.
Cheers,
John
___
MeeGo-dev mailing list
MeeGo-dev@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
Hi All:
Like the gconf is the setting database in meego touch framwork,
I want to know what is the setting database in qml, and how to ?
Thanks!
BRs___
MeeGo-touch-dev mailing list
MeeGo-touch-dev@meego.com
2011/1/13 yfengying fengying...@hotmail.com:
Hi All:
Like the gconf is the setting database in meego touch framwork,
I want to know what is the setting database in qml, and how to ?
SQL local storage:
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7-snapshot/declarative-sqllocalstorage.html
As a settings
27 matches
Mail list logo
