On 6/30/2011 10:11 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
Developers seeing bugs that they are able to fix helps the bugs get
fixed. If a module developer is searching for open bugs in "his" module
and doesn't find any, then that's a problem.
exactly; this is what the change is solving; each source package (whi
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 19:11 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Ways to solve the problem would be for the developer to search for
> something else (bugs owned by meta_ow...@meego.bugs or whatever)
That would also make it easier to follow components that one is
interested in contributing to while NOT being
Hi,
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> anything that leads to the bug getting fixed is value. that's not just
> what developers do...
Developers seeing bugs that they are able to fix helps the bugs get
fixed. If a module developer is searching for open bugs in "his" module
and doesn't find any, then that'
As long as the bugs are assigned to the original reporter, would they
not be filed with them?
Having descriptive bug reports does matter to the developer, if the
problem is not described, how can we fix it? I come from a Bugzilla
background so would this also not apply here?
On 30/06/2011 15
On 6/30/2011 7:10 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
ext Arjan van de Ven writes:
On 6/29/2011 11:57 PM, eric.le-r...@nokia.com wrote:
I hear you but isn't moving a bug to another component an important enough
event it's worth recording it in an inline comment on the bug?
I would say not. the compone
ext Arjan van de Ven writes:
> On 6/29/2011 11:57 PM, eric.le-r...@nokia.com wrote:
>>
>> I hear you but isn't moving a bug to another component an important enough
>> event it's worth recording it in an inline comment on the bug?
>
> I would say not. the component is metadata and does not add va
On 6/30/2011 7:02 AM, eric.le-r...@nokia.com wrote:
I have a very simple idea on bugs; the value of a bug lies in its
ability to fix something in the OS
that makes the OS better. Anything else around the bug is either neutral
or overhead.
Now that you put it this way, I'm more than convinced th
Hi Arjan,
On 6/30/11 4:41 PM, "ext Arjan van de Ven" wrote:
>On 6/29/2011 11:57 PM, eric.le-r...@nokia.com wrote:
>>
>> I hear you but isn't moving a bug to another component an important
>>enough
>> event it's worth recording it in an inline comment on the bug?
>
>I would say not. the component
On 6/29/2011 11:57 PM, eric.le-r...@nokia.com wrote:
I hear you but isn't moving a bug to another component an important enough
event it's worth recording it in an inline comment on the bug?
I would say not. the component is metadata and does not add value to the
bug itself
it doesn't he
Hi Arjan,
On 6/29/11 4:41 PM, "ext Arjan van de Ven" wrote:
>On 6/29/2011 2:05 AM, eric.le-r...@nokia.com wrote:
>> So I guess you could remind anyone on your side involved into moving the
>> bugs that it's mandatory to at least put a comment with the reasoning
>> behind the action.
>
>so as a u
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 06:41 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 6/29/2011 2:05 AM, eric.le-r...@nokia.com wrote:
> > So I guess you could remind anyone on your side involved into moving the
> > bugs that it's mandatory to at least put a comment with the reasoning
> > behind the action.
>
> so as a
On 6/29/2011 2:05 AM, eric.le-r...@nokia.com wrote:
So I guess you could remind anyone on your side involved into moving the
bugs that it's mandatory to at least put a comment with the reasoning
behind the action.
so as a user of bugzilla I strongly disagree with your statement.
I use the "filt
Hi,
On 6/29/11 11:33 AM, "ext Zhao, Fan" wrote:
>> Wednesday, June 29, 2011 4:15 PM
>> Marius Vollmer wrote:
>>
>> "ext Zhao, Fan" writes:
>>
>> >> Wednesday, June 29, 2011 3:13 PM
>> >> Marius Vollmer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "ext Zhao, Fan" writes:
>> >>
>> >> > The purpose of the "MeeGo Distrib
> Wednesday, June 29, 2011 4:15 PM
> Marius Vollmer wrote:
>
> "ext Zhao, Fan" writes:
>
> >> Wednesday, June 29, 2011 3:13 PM
> >> Marius Vollmer wrote:
> >>
> >> "ext Zhao, Fan" writes:
> >>
> >> > The purpose of the "MeeGo Distribution Packages" product is to provide
> >> > an option for peo
"ext Zhao, Fan" writes:
>> Wednesday, June 29, 2011 3:13 PM
>> Marius Vollmer wrote:
>>
>> "ext Zhao, Fan" writes:
>>
>> > The purpose of the "MeeGo Distribution Packages" product is to provide
>> > an option for people to report/triage bugs to packages, and it's setup
>> > for 1.3 bug reporti
> Wednesday, June 29, 2011 3:13 PM
> Marius Vollmer wrote:
>
> "ext Zhao, Fan" writes:
>
> > The purpose of the "MeeGo Distribution Packages" product is to provide
> > an option for people to report/triage bugs to packages, and it's setup
> > for 1.3 bug reporting at this moment.
>
> Creating a
"ext Zhao, Fan" writes:
> The purpose of the "MeeGo Distribution Packages" product is to provide
> an option for people to report/triage bugs to packages, and it's setup
> for 1.3 bug reporting at this moment.
Creating a new product is nice, but it is different from moving existing
bugs into it
Forwarding... In case you were not aware of the announcement.
The purpose of the "MeeGo Distribution Packages" product is to provide an
option for people to report/triage bugs to packages, and it's setup for 1.3 bug
reporting at this moment.
Thanks,
Fan
> -Original Message-
> From: meeg
18 matches
Mail list logo
