On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Foster, Dawn M wrote:
> A while back, we made the discussion to move the community office discussions
> to the forum. After living with that decision for a month or so, I'm starting
> to think that the discussions should be moved back to meego-community. The
> co
On 6/4/10 3:35 AM, "David Greaves" wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 10:19 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Andrew Flegg wrote:
>>> Personally, I prefer mailing lists (which is why it galls me to be top
>>> posting on this stupid BlackBerry), however the Internet's moved past
>>> 1996 and fora
((Cross-posting on purpose with meego-community since it is the topic of
discussion))
Hi,
On 06/04/2010 01:15 PM, ext Dave Neary wrote:
> Is there a good reason not to use Google Groups, aside from, you know,
> the whole Google thing?
By Google Groups do you mean Usenet newsgroups? It's been a w
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 10:19 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andrew Flegg wrote:
> > Personally, I prefer mailing lists (which is why it galls me to be top
> > posting on this stupid BlackBerry), however the Internet's moved past
> > 1996 and fora, despite all their comparitive flaws, are the m
Hi,
Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> The problem is that the people who should answer the questions in the
> forums likely aren't reading the forums.
>
> Simple example - I spent 17 hours in airplanes over the last 48
> hours. It's easy enough to deal with email - download, respond, send out
> the next time
Hi,
Foster, Dawn M wrote:
> The forums have been a great way for end users to get engaged with
> the project and ask questions, and I think that we should keep the end user
> discussions in the forum. This would give us a more clean split:
> * Mailing lists: MeeGo project discussions, developer di
Hi,
Andrew Flegg wrote:
> Personally, I prefer mailing lists (which is why it galls me to be top
> posting on this stupid BlackBerry), however the Internet's moved past
> 1996 and fora, despite all their comparitive flaws, are the masses'
> preferred means of group communication.
Yet another foru
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 15:16:05 -0600, "Shaver, Michael R"
wrote:
>
> >On 6/3/10 2:06 PM, "Dirk Hohndel" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:41:39 -0600, Andrew Flegg wrote:
> >> ...and a key part off making it work will be a bidirectional gateway
> >> (as Dirk says). If Reggie sticks the vBulleti
>On 6/3/10 2:06 PM, "Dirk Hohndel" wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:41:39 -0600, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>> ...and a key part off making it work will be a bidirectional gateway
>> (as Dirk says). If Reggie sticks the vBulletin plugin for it on
>> gitorious, all us ML/travelling peeps will make it bet
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:41:39 -0600, Andrew Flegg wrote:
> ...and a key part off making it work will be a bidirectional gateway
> (as Dirk says). If Reggie sticks the vBulletin plugin for it on
> gitorious, all us ML/travelling peeps will make it better to scratch
> our own itches (improve threading
...and a key part off making it work will be a bidirectional gateway
(as Dirk says). If Reggie sticks the vBulletin plugin for it on
gitorious, all us ML/travelling peeps will make it better to scratch
our own itches (improve threading, quoting etc).
Cheers,
Andrew
On 03/06/2010, Andrew Flegg
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:10:08 -0600, Randall Arnold wrote:
> > The forums have been a great way for end users to get engaged with
> > the project and ask questions, and I think that we should keep the
> > end user discussions in the forum. This would give us a more clean
> > split:
> > * Mailing lis
Hi,
Personally, I prefer mailing lists (which is why it galls me to be top
posting on this stupid BlackBerry), however the Internet's moved past
1996 and fora, despite all their comparitive flaws, are the masses'
preferred means of group communication.
However, trying to enforce a split between t
> - Original message -
> From: "Foster, Dawn M"
> To: "meego-...@meego.com"
> Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Forum / mail integration (was MeeGo Summit -
Structured brainstorming...)
> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 11:21:24 -0700
>
>
>On Jun 3, 2010, at
Hi Dawn,
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Foster, Dawn M wrote:
> A while back, we made the discussion to move the community office discussions
> to the forum. After living with that decision for a month or so, I'm starting
> to think that the discussions should be moved back to meego-community.
On Jun 3, 2010, at 6:16 AM, wrote:
>
> Reggie said that Forum/Mail integration would require more server power and
> proposed to wait until the meego.com infra is hosted at OSU OSL.
>
> forum.meego.com is not in OSU OSL yet and this is the main reason why we are
> stuck in this forum/mail i
On 03/06/10 14:16, quim@nokia.com wrote:
GET THE BLOODY THING FIXED!
You did trim the next line where I said "Please :)" ... but OK, that didn't come
off - I apologise if my poor attempt at humour offended anyone.
Reggie said that Forum/Mail integration would require more server power and
> GET THE BLOODY THING FIXED!
Reggie said that Forum/Mail integration would require more server power and
proposed to wait until the meego.com infra is hosted at OSU OSL.
forum.meego.com is not in OSU OSL yet and this is the main reason why we are
stuck in this forum/mail integration.
PS: yes
18 matches
Mail list logo
