Hi, let's see if we can move into specific details to find and fix whatever is
problematic in this discussion about using anything close to meego in
packages and distro names.
About using meego or something similar to name a distro using MeeGo related
components, the opinion of The Linux
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, quim@nokia.com wrote:
About package names, since they are open source (LGPL,
Apache...) there shouldn't be any problems redistributing
them with the same name, isn't it. If there is a problem
with the name or license of a specific package please
let's file a bug
On 12/14/2010 7:57 AM, quim@nokia.com wrote:
Hi, let's see if we can move into specific details to find and fix whatever is
problematic in this discussion about using anything close to meego in
packages and distro names.
Can that discussion *PLEASE* move away from the development list
- Original message -
From: quim@nokia.com
To: meego-dev@meego.com
Subject: [MeeGo-dev] Using meego or similar in packages and distro
names
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:57:01 +
�
Progress in this discussion is measured in improvements to the
current documentation and bugs filed
On Di, 2010-12-14 at 08:35 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On 12/14/2010 7:57 AM, quim@nokia.com wrote:
Hi, let's see if we can move into specific details to find and fix whatever
is problematic in this discussion about using anything close to meego in
packages and distro names.
On 12/14/2010 8:47 AM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Di, 2010-12-14 at 08:35 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On 12/14/2010 7:57 AM, quim@nokia.com wrote:
Hi, let's see if we can move into specific details to find and fix whatever is
problematic in this discussion about using anything close
