Re: [MeeGo-dev] libproxy and core compliance

2011-06-22 Thread Sergio Schvezov
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Wichmann, Mats D wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Sergio Schvezov > wrote: >> >> I'm currently taking recommendations to implement obtaining the proxy >> from system configuration, most people seem to recommend libproxy, >> which is fine. The problem

Re: [MeeGo-dev] libproxy and core compliance

2011-06-20 Thread Wichmann, Mats D
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > I'm currently taking recommendations to implement obtaining the proxy > from system configuration, most people seem to recommend libproxy, > which is fine. The problem I see with it is that if you take a look at > the MeeGo Compliance docu

Re: [MeeGo-dev] libproxy and core compliance

2011-06-20 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em Monday, 20 de June de 2011, às 13:40:19, Sergio Schvezov escreveu: > Is it possible to have this included as part of the API or is there aproject underway to have Qt implement this functionality wrappingaround libproxy or something? QNetworkProxy exists, but I'm not sure where it would be getti

[MeeGo-dev] libproxy and core compliance

2011-06-20 Thread Sergio Schvezov
I'm currently taking recommendations to implement obtaining the proxy from system configuration, most people seem to recommend libproxy, which is fine. The problem I see with it is that if you take a look at the MeeGo Compliance document (latest: http://wiki.meego.com/images/MeeGo-Compliance-Spec-1