On Aug 20, 2010, at 11:53 PM, § सोनाली § wrote:
> As I am studying MeeGo OS as my seminar Topic I have some basic question.
>
> 1. As everyone is saying meego is completely open source and fully Linux the
> how it provides security?
> And how it is safe from hackers and intruders?
>
> 2. Which
Hi Sonali,
I'm not sure whether all of your questions fit in meego-dev, but I'll reply
anyway to the best of my knowledge.
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 12:23 PM, § सोनाली § wrote:
> As I am studying MeeGo OS as my seminar Topic I have some basic question.
>
> 1. As everyone is saying meego is complet
As I am studying MeeGo OS as my seminar Topic I have some basic question.
1. As everyone is saying meego is completely open source and fully Linux the
how it provides security?
And how it is safe from hackers and intruders?
2. Which are the processor MeeGo supports to?
3. Is there is meaning to
On 10/06/2010 14:17, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
>>> MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model
>>> and codebase. More details about that:
>>>
>>> http://fosdem.org/2010/schedule/events/maemo
>>>
>>> Nokia is open sourcing t
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Mats BERGSTROM
wrote:
> Hi,
> I totally appreciate your battle not being a stranger to them myself :*
> However, are you able to guesstimate an ETA?
Come over to OLS and/or Security summit. This will be
presented properly in both events and I think by that
Reshetova
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Security architecture
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>> MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model
>> and codebase. More details about that:
>>
>> http://fosdem.org/2010/schedule/events/maemo
>>
How does the manifest policy get loaded into LSM based module? How is
the policy distributed with applications? Something similar to Android
manifest?
--
Shaz
___
MeeGo-dev mailing list
MeeGo-dev@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Ware, Ryan R wrote:
> We also need to take into account that this solution needs to work on
> non-ARM hardware. ;-)
>
Non ARM is much more easy because we will be dealing with TPM chip and TXT.
Does atom based boards come with TPM. If yes I can start contributi
We also need to take into account that this solution needs to work on
non-ARM hardware. ;-)
Ryan
On 6/10/10 9:56 AM, "Shaz" wrote:
> Secondly, I do agree that EVM is not very suitable for trustzone but what is
> more suitable? In my opinion a single file protected by secure/trusted boot
> and
On 6/10/10 12:04 PM, "Shaz" wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Janne Karhunen
wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Shaz wrote:
>>
Do you have in mind a particular use case and risks you wish to protect
against? I can take that example to explain how it can be done by our
>
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Janne Karhunen
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Shaz wrote:
>
> >> Do you have in mind a particular use case and risks you wish to protect
> >> against? I can take that example to explain how it can be done by our
> >> framework.
> >
> > Please re-read t
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Shaz wrote:
>> Do you have in mind a particular use case and risks you wish to protect
>> against? I can take that example to explain how it can be done by our
>> framework.
>
> Please re-read the use-case again ... you have overly simplified it.
> Openness betwee
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let me try to answer some questions.
>
> > How can we fit this in TCG MPWG and OMTP TR0/1 specs?
>
> I prefer to speak about the needed properties/features, rather than about
> particular specs unless there is a requirement to sat
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Shaz wrote:
>
> >> Task can hold tokens named 'Calendar' and 'Phonebook' for
> >> accessing these interfaces. Or, we can drop this even
> >> lower by saying Calendar::function and everything else is
> >> not
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Shaz wrote:
>> Task can hold tokens named 'Calendar' and 'Phonebook' for
>> accessing these interfaces. Or, we can drop this even
>> lower by saying Calendar::function and everything else is
>> not granted for.
>
> This is where dbus comes in ... right?
Well we d
>
> Task can hold tokens named 'Calendar' and 'Phonebook' for
> accessing these interfaces. Or, we can drop this even
> lower by saying Calendar::function and everything else is
> not granted for.
>
>
This is where dbus comes in ... right? And now I am loosing what LSM and
rbac does here :)
>
> >
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Shaz wrote:
>> >> Effective bits in access control are quite simple and similar to
>> >> SMACK. Check the linux-security-module discussion for starters.
>> >> The 'real' difference between smack and this is that we support
>> >> multiple task labels and the fact t
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Shaz wrote:
>
> >> Effective bits in access control are quite simple and similar to
> >> SMACK. Check the linux-security-module discussion for starters.
> >> The 'real' difference between smack and this is t
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> FYI, a number of patches were posted to the D-Bus mailing list a couple of
> days ago.
>
> As expected, the mailing list's reaction was "use PolKit"...
Duh, that was just Pekka going solo and nothing more serious
than that..
--
// Ja
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Shaz wrote:
>> Effective bits in access control are quite simple and similar to
>> SMACK. Check the linux-security-module discussion for starters.
>> The 'real' difference between smack and this is that we support
>> multiple task labels and the fact that we don't
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Shaz wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Janne Karhunen
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> >> MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model
>> >> and codebase. More details about that:
>> >>
>> >
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> >> MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model
> >> and codebase. More details about that:
> >>
> >> http://fosdem.org/2010/schedule/events/maemo
> >>
> >> Nokia
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>> MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model
>> and codebase. More details about that:
>>
>> http://fosdem.org/2010/schedule/events/maemo
>>
>> Nokia is open sourcing the security componets starting now.
>
> "now"? Cool,
Em Quinta-feira 10 Junho 2010, às 12:59:13, Tomas Frydrych escreveu:
> > As expected, the mailing list's reaction was "use PolKit"...
>
> I wonder, why was it expected ?
Well, it was expected to me. A few months ago, I was contacted about some
questions on modifying D-Bus, which looked like a se
Hi,
On 09/06/10 22:38, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> FYI, a number of patches were posted to the D-Bus mailing list a
> couple of days ago.
>
> As expected, the mailing list's reaction was "use PolKit"...
I wonder, why was it expected ?
Looking through the dbus archive, the mailing list reaction to
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 11:55:32PM +0300, Poussa Sakari wrote:
> On 06/09/10 22:11, ext Shaz wrote:
> >Dear all,
> >
> >I work on security engineering of client side and I am interested to
> >know what the developments are at meego community. It would be a
> >pleasure if I can contribute. I was tol
Em Quarta-feira 9. Junho 2010, às 22.55.32, Poussa Sakari escreveu:
> Nokia is open sourcing the security componets starting now. It includes
> kernel modules, userspace libs, D-Bus patches, API documentation, etc. The
> plan is to start integrating that to MeeGo during summer time. This of
> cours
On 06/09/10 22:11, ext Shaz wrote:
Dear all,
I work on security engineering of client side and I am interested to
know what the developments are at meego community. It would be a
pleasure if I can contribute. I was told to contact Ryan who leads the
security team but I have no idea how to ping h
Dear all,
I work on security engineering of client side and I am interested to know
what the developments are at meego community. It would be a pleasure if I
can contribute. I was told to contact Ryan who leads the security team but I
have no idea how to ping him therefore addressing the developer
29 matches
Mail list logo
