Dear Yongsop Hwang,
Seems it is quite physical the oscillating of E and H and have similarity with
Fresnel zones. But it is not for Sx (by the way - you may use sx as you use ex,
ey, hz, http://
jdj.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Meep_Reference#Constants_.28enumerated_types.29
).
You should be carefull wit
Dear Steven and all meep users,
My question is this.
Q: Why do the integration of CW fields depend on the frequency?
It's a 2D FDTD calculation in xy-plane.
I've launched a CW source of Hz polarization at a certain point,
and integrated Ex, Ey, Hz fields and the Poynting vector Sx on a certain
yz
Sasha,
If you are interested to using the Python interface to Meep, then take a
look at the example at the end of paragraph 5 in the documentation which
you can find here :
http://claudia.intec.ugent.be/software/python-meep/python_meep_documentation.html
Look for the example under the sentence "He
Thank you a lot, Emmanuel!
Now I'm not using the Python Interface for doing the calculations with meep,
however if there is'n another way (e.g. in the ctl file with the facilities
of scheme language) I will study the possibility to use python interface you
have write about.
I suppose, there is a p
Dear Mischa, you suggest Kadir to use the shape of the mode he desire as the
spatial amplitude for an extended source. I've read the meep-tutor and study
some examples
of meep's ctl file and I haven't find the proper way to set the spacial
distribution
of field (of source exactly) for example i
5 matches
Mail list logo