add on_delete= to all ForeignKey's,
including migrations...
django-otp definitely looks like the way to go however. Not so sure yet
if it is better to use kleides-mfa or write my own application specific
views however.
--
Brian May
https://linuxpenguins.xyz/br
Hello,
Just wondering what is a good MFA library for Django that people use?
I had a feeling there was a good one, just can't thing of it right now.
I have looked at django-mfa and django-mfa2, but encountered a number of
trivial issues, which probably would mean forking the project to fix.
tqsic.com/contact
--
Brian May
https://linuxpenguins.xyz/brian/
___
melbourne-pug mailing list
melbourne-pug@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
On 2018-08-08 16:12, Matt Trentini wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Damien and my slides can be found here: A Taste of Micropython [1].
Unfortunately I was unable to attend. I notice from the slides the
following statement: "Supports threading without a GIL (with some
caveats)"
Just wondering what
Peter Dwyer writes:
> I haven’t attended any meetings. Is there a fee?
No fees. Unless you want pizza, which case you might be asked to donate
for the cause.
--
Brian May
https://linuxpenguins.xyz/brian/
___
melbourne-pug mailing list
melbourne-
Levi Cameron <levi.came...@alliancesoftware.com.au> writes:
> (Although without knowing the test case in detail I would have expected it
> would fail consistently)
Yes, this is what gets to me. The tests themselves are pretty
consistant, and do the same things everytime.
--
B
n't many positions
that would be interested in this sort of investment. Including some big
companies. Of course, it is also hard to tell for sure when so much
advertising is from recruiters who don't bother mentioning these
details.
--
Brian May <br...@linuxpenguins.xyz>
https:/
thon-ctypes
Thing you meant to say "attribute" not "argument". It seems to pass the
tests if I add .raw to the end, so hopefully that means it is working...
Thanks for the pointer.
--
Brian May <br...@linuxpenguins.xyz>
https://linuxpenguins.xyz/brian/
_
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 at 18:52 Chris Hausler chaus...@gmail.com wrote:
IPython notebooks could be an option, I've done a few presentations with
it and it makes it really easy to share your code and slides afterwards via
Git.
Just an update:
I am currently looking at pandoc + reveal.js
It does
Hello,
Just wondering what is good presentation software that is up to date (i.e.
one I just looked at hasn't been updated since 2009, so doesn't count).
Ideally, in order of most important preference first, it should have all of
the following features:
* Works with typical dual screen - as is
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 at 12:45 Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
It seems you dismiss the idea that the administrator should do what is
best based on the facts and trade-offs, whether or not it is most
popular. You defer that responsibility instead to whichever group
marshals the most
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 at 12:39 Tennessee Leeuwenburg tleeuwenb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I personally don't believe that list settings really fulfil the goal of
providing information security to emails. I think people are responsible
for checking their own correspondence. This is a public forum, and
On Tue, 26 May 2015 at 09:25 N6151H n61...@gmail.com wrote:
* The failure mode of “don't do anything with Reply-To” is that
sometimes people send a message to an individual, that they *intended*
to go more public.
* The failure mode of “set Reply-To to the mailing list” is that
?
Apologies for the late response; I only found out last Friday that my
current position at VPAC is being made redundant (4 weeks notice) due to
poor financial status. As as I result, I still need to update my resume.
Regards.
Brian May
PS. Sorry, I don't seem to have a pitchfork handy
Apologies for the last post - assuming it got through, it was suppose to be
a private reply, but I failed to notice in time that this mailing list sets
the reply-to header, and as such the private reply was redirected back to
the list[1].
I don't think there was anything actually private in my
= f.readline().strip()
setup(
name=python-alogger,
version=version,
url='https://github.com/Karaage-Cluster/python-alogger',
author='Brian May',
author_email='br...@v3.org.au',
description='Small python library to parse resource manager logs',
packages=find_packages
that was a good talk at the PyConAu Django miniconf.
--
Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au
___
melbourne-pug mailing list
melbourne-pug@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
), that isn't connected to testtools in any
way.
Thanks
--
Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au
___
melbourne-pug mailing list
melbourne-pug@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
On 4 February 2014 08:57, Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote:
After last night's talk on Python future, I decided to look up the status
of packages for Debian.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736523
Oops. Seems to have deteriorated into a silly argument over
After last night's talk on Python future, I decided to look up the status
of packages for Debian.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736523
Oops. Seems to have deteriorated into a silly argument over what teamwork
means :-(
--
Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au
this:
./manage.py runserver
You will get a single process single threaded server that can only process
one HTTP request at the time.
However in my case, I was running two separate processes at the same time,
and neither process knows about the other process in any way.
--
Brian May br
sql (just for that table).
Not sure this is required.
Actually, like I said, this stuff has changed in Django 1.6, so it might be
better off testing Django 1.6 now.
--
Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au
___
melbourne-pug mailing list
melbourne-pug
compatibility with existing applications unnecessarily.
--
Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au
___
melbourne-pug mailing list
melbourne-pug@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
transactions support is different
in 1.6; I don't really understand what has changed however).
Will continue looking at this tomorrow.
--
Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au
___
melbourne-pug mailing list
melbourne-pug@python.org
https://mail.python.org
://julien.danjou.info/blog/2013/rant-about-github-pull-request-workflow-implementation
Just because it is in the cloud doesn't mean that they have implemented in
the best possible way.
--
Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au
___
melbourne-pug mailing list
Perhaps I need to give some some specific examples.
Example 1: we need to display the user some data, however this is slow, so
we try to cache it:
try:
cache = Cache.objects.get(start=?, stop=?)
except Model.DoesNotExist:
data = get_data(start=?,stop=?)
cache =
without giving an error.
Much easier to catch the errors as soon as possible.
Having asserts through your code also helps document the assumptions you
made when you wrote it, which in turn makes it easier to understand the
code.
--
Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au
:
https://gist.github.com/brianmay/6059401
To test, run code, stop LDAP server, errors should appear. Then restart
LDAP server and errors should disappear.
Thanks
--
Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au
___
melbourne-pug mailing list
melbourne-pug
28 matches
Mail list logo
