On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Dustin wrote:
>
> It's not so much an issue about the age/speed of the hardware as it
> is hitting platforms and instruction sets.
>
> I don't know anything about ArchLinux, but surely a welcome
> contribution if you think there's anything sufficiently differen
Hips,
> I wrote up this wiki page to hopefully get you started:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/BuildFarm
Could you update that wiki page to contain info about how heavy usage
such buildbot has? Like how frequently such build process is called,
roughly how much data it will be down
On Jul 20, 11:16 pm, Clint Webb wrote:
> Is there any interest in a buildbot for some older hardware?
> I'm guessing not, but if there is, I have some old development servers we
> use.
It's not so much an issue about the age/speed of the hardware as it
is hitting platforms and instruction set
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Dustin wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 20, 12:29 pm, Jozef Sevcik wrote:
>
> > I'm interesting in contributing with 'my' platform, but I'm not sure:
> > a) is there some list of what platforms are covered right now
> > b) how does it work ? what should I provide if I want to
On Jul 20, 12:29 pm, Jozef Sevcik wrote:
> I'm interesting in contributing with 'my' platform, but I'm not sure:
> a) is there some list of what platforms are covered right now
> b) how does it work ? what should I provide if I want to contribute ?
> what should I study/setup ?
I wrote up th
On Jul 20, 2:07 pm, Harish Kumar wrote:
> I am kinda new to a research group and I am trying to understand the
> code of facebook-memcached.
You're asking questions about a somewhat uncommon piece of
software. Is there a particular reason you're looking at that version
instead of the commun
Replication,which you can use repcached.
http://repcached.lab.klab.org/
theevergreenman wrote:
Hi,
I am considering Memcached, and am having trouble finding some info.
1) Is there a 64 bit version of Memcached?
2) If there is only a 32 bit version, does that not limit each node to
4Gb of memo
Can you explain what you mean by "expire" ? You've gone into great detail
about needing it, but I don't see how explicitly expiring items is doing
you get good over letting them be evicted? Or by setting more sane
expiration times?
There is expire in the protocol already? Just not mass expire
Hi there,
background: we are using some clusters and running memcached on
about 30..40 servers with about lots of ram dedicated to the memcache.
short:
1) I know there is no such thing as an expire in memcached.
2) I know memcached is not a database and never will be.
but it would be good if th
>
> Memcache doesn't have any replication and doesn't need it. Its a
> distributed cache, which means the keys will be distributed
> automagically between machines.
While the server does not perform any replication I believe the
libmemcached client does provide replication functionality.
Joseph
Memcache works on 64bit, we have machines running 6GB or more.
Memcache doesn't have any replication and doesn't need it. Its a
distributed cache, which means the keys will be distributed
automagically between machines.
On Jul 20, 2009, at 2:39 PM, theevergreenman wrote:
Hi,
I am cons
Hi,
I am considering Memcached, and am having trouble finding some info.
1) Is there a 64 bit version of Memcached?
2) If there is only a 32 bit version, does that not limit each node to
4Gb of memory?
3) Does Memcached support replication?
Thanks
Tim
Hi,
I am kinda new to a research group and I am trying to understand the
code of facebook-memcached. Can any one help me out please. I am
unable to understand why flat allocator is used. In the config.h file
the USE_FLAT_ALLOCATOR is commented out. When does the code use slab
allocator and when d
You can use any IP address as long as you can make a connection to it. It
doesn't matter the IP address.
Each server acts as a "pool". Your client application decides which server
to contact depending on the key (or any other parameters you specify in your
client code).
2 things I would worry abo
I am curious what is the network requirement to build the memcached
servers across data centers. Do they need to be on the same network
subnet?
for instance, the servers on data center A are with 10.1.1.0/24, do
the servers on data center also require 10.1.1.0/24, so that they will
be in the s
Hello all,
I noticed several e-mails in mailing list about how buildbots can be
helpful for testing memcached on different platforms,
I'm interesting in contributing with 'my' platform, but I'm not sure:
a) is there some list of what platforms are covered right now
b) how does it work ? what shou
Brian Moon wrote:
I may not be at the Gearman BoF but want to meet up with you guys. Do
we know the where part yet?
Yep, all confirmed.
Wednesday 7/22, we have a spot reserved at Gordon Biersch, 8pm. 33 E
San Fernando St., San Jose, CA 95113. I believe it's between 1st and
2nd street.
On Jul 20, 8:41 am, Trond Norbye wrote:
> We talked about this issue on IRC earlier today, and it turns out that
> this is on memcached 1.2.2... I think we should await further
> investigation until they can reproduce the bug on 1.4..
That's fine. If I find myself sitting around looking
The difference of opensolaris x86 vs. solaris x86 is like Fedora vs.
RedHat. Sorry, I won't be able to setup a buildbot, but I can provide
the executable for anyone who wants it.
On the extern prototype change, this only affects Solaris, and it's
nice to have standard prototype format.
On the E
On 20. juli. 2009, at 17.35, Dustin wrote:
I filed http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=68
Can you please update it with the version you're running?
Meanwhile, there needs to at least be a test for it. I'll see if I
can do that today.
We talked about this issue on IRC
I filed http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=68
Can you please update it with the version you're running?
Meanwhile, there needs to at least be a test for it. I'll see if I
can do that today.
On Jul 20, 7:53 am, chx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a really weird bug to report, f
Hi,
I have a really weird bug to report, first of all, this fixed it:
-memcached_return ret = memcached_add(memcached_, key.c_str(),
key.length(), "1", 1, 7200, 0);
+memcached_return ret = memcached_add(memcached_, key.c_str(),
key.length(), "1", 5, 7200, 0);
These are then i
Yes, there's definite overlap with those working with/on Gearman, so
let's target 8:30 instead. Those who want to proceed from the Gearman
BoF can, and those who may be doing another BoF or something else
interesting will just know where/when to meet us.
I may not be at the Gearman BoF but wan
My problem seems to resolve.
I used the following command
memcached -d -p 11212 -u nobody -c 1024 -m 64
I am not sure what is the different compare to the previous command
that makes it not running properly.
On Jul 15, 2:23 pm, dormando wrote:
> > On Jul 14, 7:21 am, gunyhake wrote:
> > > @t
24 matches
Mail list logo
