On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 22:13:24 +0100 (BST) Organic Spider
wrote:
OS> again am exploring how I may use memcached to distribute data between
OS> multiple nodes; with one being the central hub. Yes I could use MySQL
OS> with Master/N+slaves but that is such a large overhead on each node
OS> when it
Hi everyone,
I'm new to memcached. Here's my question:
When we are configuring clients with memcached, we enter server addresses
running memcached in our client application.
Our servers; S1, S2, S3, S4
Clients: C1, C2
Now suppose for C1, we give memcached servers as S1, S2, S3
for C2: S2, S3, S4
> Hi everyone,
> I'm new to memcached. Here's my question:
> When we are configuring clients with memcached, we enter server addresses
> running memcached in our client application.
> Our servers; S1, S2, S3, S4
> Clients: C1, C2
>
> Now suppose for C1, we give memcached servers as S1, S2, S3
> fo
Shouldn't we make a single application server (and clone of it using a
common config server for load balancing)? As done with sharded/distributed
databases.
Just one application server. I guess it can be easily done with the present
model but for new people/ movers from conventional model, would b
> Shouldn't we make a single application server (and clone of it using a common
> config server for load balancing)? As done with sharded/distributed
> databases.
> Just one application server. I guess it can be easily done with the present
> model but for new people/ movers from conventional mo
Yep I got that point, but I'm saying is suppose you have many many clients &
servers. Now if you want to scale your system, you'd add more servers.
Now then you'll need to update server list on each client.
Basically creating a single end-point (which can be replicated too using a
same config ser
> Yep I got that point, but I'm saying is suppose you have many many clients &
> servers. Now if you want to scale your system, you'd add more servers.
> Now then you'll need to update server list on each client.
>
> Basically creating a single end-point (which can be replicated too using a
> sam
Thanks for sharing it.
I'm an undergrad student so still lack on quite a things.
Again, thanks!
But, its so awesome to play with memcached. Just thought of this
point, so shared here :)
On Aug 27, 12:33 am, dormando wrote:
> > Yep I got that point, but I'm saying is suppose you have many many
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Neeraj Agarwal wrote:
> Thanks for sharing it.
>
> I'm an undergrad student so still lack on quite a things.
>
> Again, thanks!
>
> But, its so awesome to play with memcached. Just thought of this
> point, so shared here :)
>
Note that having a temporarily differe
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:25 AM, dormando wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I think that memcached source ins't compatible with solaris, because it
> use some async operations that it don't support (but I'm not sure).
> > For solaris you need to download Cool Stack, which have the CSKmemcached.
>
> Errr no. Tro
10 matches
Mail list logo
