think there's any reason to believe that more clients would cause
> > degradation?
>
> > Have you considered making this an option? I'm assuming the most
> > common response to this will be "Memcached works very well for what
> > it was designed. Don
s very well for what it was
> designed. Don't mess with that."
>
> Mike.
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Josh Dybnis wrote:
>
> > memcached-prefix is an experimental fork off of the memcached 1.3
> > development branch. It adds commands pget and pdelete
memcached-prefix is an experimental fork off of the memcached 1.3
development branch. It adds commands pget and pdelete that operate on
ranges of keys having a common prefix. The new commands can be used as
a simple namespace mechanism. It also adds a memcachedb compatible
rget command.
Performan
