Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: eb18f0a0a7f137068dbe639ac630acae02edd655
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/eb18f0a0a7f137068dbe639ac630acae02edd655
Author: Adam Thomason
Date: 2009-07-14 (Tue, 14 Jul 2009)
Changed paths:
M memc
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: b8e106f775db38b50602470142136530c20b1125
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/b8e106f775db38b50602470142136530c20b1125
Author: Dustin Sallings
Date: 2009-08-13 (Thu, 13 Aug 2009)
Changed paths:
M te
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: 7bb82191573d7eb11f35dc3573a68bf811bae25c
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/7bb82191573d7eb11f35dc3573a68bf811bae25c
Author: Trond Norbye
Date: 2009-08-14 (Fri, 14 Aug 2009)
Changed paths:
M memca
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: 18e75bdc19992c846f96f688297ca9904de37379
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/18e75bdc19992c846f96f688297ca9904de37379
Author: dormando
Date: 2009-08-25 (Tue, 25 Aug 2009)
Changed paths:
M doc/proto
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: 483e82adc89c984cbe040857d9cf43fc725883cd
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/483e82adc89c984cbe040857d9cf43fc725883cd
Author: dormando
Date: 2009-08-26 (Wed, 26 Aug 2009)
Changed paths:
M memcached
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: 4f5679356a2f98ffeb905840f28b2bc5a1498293
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/4f5679356a2f98ffeb905840f28b2bc5a1498293
Author: Dustin Sallings
Date: 2009-08-29 (Sat, 29 Aug 2009)
Changed paths:
M .g
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: a24b1b17a3b0cb426ab640c4a5f29f10a332617e
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/a24b1b17a3b0cb426ab640c4a5f29f10a332617e
Author: Trond Norbye
Date: 2009-08-29 (Sat, 29 Aug 2009)
Changed paths:
M memca
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: f9bc2b11edf151ce4b33efbe011bd807f14180ca
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/f9bc2b11edf151ce4b33efbe011bd807f14180ca
Author: Dustin Sallings
Date: 2009-09-02 (Wed, 02 Sep 2009)
Changed paths:
M t/
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: a772ec24ef381f00d33877f2b2589dadbde53331
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/a772ec24ef381f00d33877f2b2589dadbde53331
Author: Vladimir
Date: 2009-09-10 (Thu, 10 Sep 2009)
Changed paths:
M memcached
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: fbe752c9fda9629c1d79e3191570a32e8bcd45f4
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/fbe752c9fda9629c1d79e3191570a32e8bcd45f4
Author: Mat Hostetter
Date: 2009-09-10 (Thu, 10 Sep 2009)
Changed paths:
M item
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: 943f2e2b245f0ca245ec35abf3fdfba7a900bb0d
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/943f2e2b245f0ca245ec35abf3fdfba7a900bb0d
Author: Trond Norbye
Date: 2009-09-10 (Thu, 10 Sep 2009)
Changed paths:
M memca
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: 016f752b5cac1310eabaf997ee0909f2f6e0f5b0
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/016f752b5cac1310eabaf997ee0909f2f6e0f5b0
Author: Dustin Sallings
Date: 2009-09-14 (Mon, 14 Sep 2009)
Changed paths:
M RE
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: c9d03aa13a4500db7ec2a0fb3c14d5c9c6a12575
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/c9d03aa13a4500db7ec2a0fb3c14d5c9c6a12575
Author: Dustin Sallings
Date: 2009-09-15 (Tue, 15 Sep 2009)
Changed paths:
M t/
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: 37be4c42c82c57c8445af8f815518c00d4d83d18
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/37be4c42c82c57c8445af8f815518c00d4d83d18
Author: Dustin Sallings
Date: 2009-09-17 (Thu, 17 Sep 2009)
Changed paths:
M pr
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: 69743bd52c97cf96c01a9a2ea8395cfda0d9118d
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/69743bd52c97cf96c01a9a2ea8395cfda0d9118d
Author: Trond Norbye
Date: 2009-09-17 (Thu, 17 Sep 2009)
Changed paths:
M Makef
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: 73628d3e9ae44b14ef31412e7b7d82507d2e7f30
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/73628d3e9ae44b14ef31412e7b7d82507d2e7f30
Author: Trond Norbye
Date: 2009-09-18 (Fri, 18 Sep 2009)
Changed paths:
M confi
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: 2fe44f1c75621c5c759b3314f3cd19ccde7f5df2
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/2fe44f1c75621c5c759b3314f3cd19ccde7f5df2
Author: Dmitry Isaykin
Date: 2009-09-18 (Fri, 18 Sep 2009)
Changed paths:
M mem
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: 7af0829ced0ff7220cd7e5fb274150087b2d6407
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/7af0829ced0ff7220cd7e5fb274150087b2d6407
Author: Ryan Tomayko
Date: 2009-09-21 (Mon, 21 Sep 2009)
Changed paths:
M scrip
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: http://github.com/memcached/memcached
Commit: 2c7bfeb83c0f247b9f6ee9678a681658eaf8535b
http://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/2c7bfeb83c0f247b9f6ee9678a681658eaf8535b
Author: Trond Norbye
Date: 2009-09-22 (Tue, 22 Sep 2009)
Changed paths:
M items
Status: Accepted
Owner: dsallings
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 70 by dsallings: Incorrect data type when referencing the data
size of an item.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=70
The item struct records the number of bytes as an int. This should be
unsigned
Updates:
Owner: dormando
Comment #1 on issue 70 by dsallings: Incorrect data type when referencing
the data size of an item.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=70
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the ow
Updates:
Status: New
Comment #1 on issue 68 by dsallings: incr/decr resize corruption
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=68
I'm marking this as "new" as opposed to "accepted" since "accepted" implies
that the
problem has been reproduced. Here I'm just recording somet
Comment #2 on issue 70 by dsallings: Incorrect data type when referencing
the data size of an item.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=70
Easy way to reproduce on the commandline:
printf 'set aa 0 1 2147483647\r\nscoobyscoobydoo' | nc localhost
11211
--
You rece
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 71 by jc.redoutey: Statistics not updated when flush is issued in
binary mode
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=71
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Start memcached
2. Issue a flush in binary mode
Status: Accepted
Owner: dsallings
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical
New issue 72 by dsallings: 1.4.0 binary multi-get crash issue.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=72
An issue was found at sixapart involving large-ish multigets over the
binary protocol. While completely
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: trond.norbye
Comment #1 on issue 72 by trond.norbye: 1.4.0 binary multi-get crash issue.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=72
The problem is the way we execute a pipeline of commands. It expects the
command
header, key and extlen
Comment #2 on issue 72 by athomason: 1.4.0 binary multi-get crash issue.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=72
Confirmed that this fixes my crash case. Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred t
Comment #3 on issue 72 by athomason: 1.4.0 binary multi-get crash issue.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=72
Actually, I should have tried it a few more times... I still get the crash.
Trying
more to reproduce.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the ow
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #4 on issue 72 by dsallings: 1.4.0 binary multi-get crash issue.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=72
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue
Comment #5 on issue 72 by trond.norbye: 1.4.0 binary multi-get crash issue.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=72
Fixed two other problems:
1) If the key+extras+header is bigger than the input buffer we need to grow
the buffer
2) rcurr points to the _beginning_ of the curren
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 72 by trond.norbye: 1.4.0 binary multi-get crash issue.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=72
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issu
Status: Accepted
Owner: trond.norbye
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 73 by trond.norbye: It should be possible to let memcached grab
an ephemeral port
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=73
To ease testing it should be possible to let memcached grab an ephe
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #1 on issue 73 by trond.norbye: It should be possible to let
memcached grab an ephemeral port
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=73
Patch proposal:
http://github.com/trondn/memcached/commit/279857c77b9550aa3b936b1b5379cb96d49d8dfb
-
Comment #2 on issue 73 by dsallings: It should be possible to let memcached
grab an ephemeral port
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=73
You know, -1 sounds wrong until you think of it as just for testing. I
think this
will clean up a lot of our tests, so I'm definitely
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 73 by dsallings: It should be possible to let memcached
grab an ephemeral port
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=73
This has been pushed.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of thi
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 74 by robert.coles: configure script incorrectly identifies sparc
v9 as little endian, selecting incorrect hash function.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=74
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. com
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #1 on issue 71 by dsallings: Statistics not updated when flush is
issued in binary mode
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=71
I've got a fix for this in my issue_71 branch.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the o
;stats.flush_cmds++;
-STATS_UNLOCK();
if(ntokens == (c->noreply ? 3 : 2)) {
settings.oldest_live = current_time - 1;
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue noti
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low
Comment #1 on issue 75 by dsallings: Unnecessary stats locks around flushes.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=75
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #1 on issue 74 by dsallings: configure script incorrectly
identifies sparc v9 as little endian, selecting incorrect hash function.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=74
I've written a test for this bug against 1.4.0+ and I'm not findi
Updates:
Status: Started
Cc: trond.norbye dormando
Comment #2 on issue 75 by dsallings: Unnecessary stats locks around flushes.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=75
Can someone take a look at this and tell me if I'm doing this wrong?
--
You received this messa
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 71 by dsallings: Statistics not updated when flush is
issued in binary mode
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=71
Pushed.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or becau
Comment #3 on issue 75 by dsallings: Unnecessary stats locks around flushes.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=75
Pushed.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 75 by dsallings: Unnecessary stats locks around flushes.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=75
Pushed.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this is
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 63 by dsallings: confusing errors when failing to bind
to a port
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=63
This wasn't as bad as it used to be, but the vperror fix was pushed.
--
You received this message because you are listed
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 65 by dsallings: test_issue_44 fails on my machine with
memcached running
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=65
This has been fixed.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issu
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 42 by dsallings: Stats slabs should include the number
of requested bytes
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=42
This was good, though it does have the caveat of having a test that's
dependent on
the item size, so is somew
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 53 by dsallings: manpage uses hyphen as a minus sign
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=53
Pushed this through.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starre
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 64 by dsallings: OpenBSD warns of misused string
functions
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=64
All of these are cleaned up.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or b
Status: New
Owner: dsallings
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 77 by dsallings: Spurious failures on the OpenBSD builder
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=77
This one's pretty common:
assertion "read(sock, &response, sizeof(response)) == sizeof(response)"
failed:
Status: Accepted
Owner: ingenthr
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 78 by ingenthr: DTrace probes return types could be better
documented
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=78
DTrace probes return unsigned int, and DTrace itself sees everything as
uint64_t meaning
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Cc: dsallings trond.norbye
Comment #1 on issue 78 by ingenthr: DTrace probes return types could be
better documented
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=78
Proposed fix in
http://github.com/ingenthr/memcached/commit/1519ce0c007a55106f0e6
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #5 on issue 58 by trond.norbye: Use specialized clock thread
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=58
Nah.. the timers is only used by the thread accepting new clients so it's
not a big problem...
--
You received this message because yo
Comment #1 on issue 77 by dsallings: Spurious failures on the OpenBSD
builder
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=77
The second part was a real problem, moving to a separate bug.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or
Status: Accepted
Owner: trond.norbye
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 79 by dsallings: Buffer overrun in prefix stats
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=79
This was causing build failures on OpenBSD, but nowhere else. Apparently
there actually was a wolf.
--
You
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 79 by trond.norbye: Buffer overrun in prefix stats
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=79
Pushed
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
Yo
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 80 by killme2008: addq is not quiet
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=80
When i use addq(0x12) to add a new value when the key's data is existed,it
is
not quiet,memcached 1.4.0 write a response back with m
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #2 on issue 77 by trond.norbye: Spurious failures on the OpenBSD
builder
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=77
The assertion was caused by a bug in the reallocation of the input buffer..
See fix in my tree
--
You received this me
Comment #1 on issue 76 by james.cohen: The spec file is not up to date
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=76
I spotted another build problem too with the includes directory missing.
Attached is
a diff compared to the v1.4.0 dist .spec file which allows for a good build
on C
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Owner: dsallings
Labels: Component-Docs
Comment #1 on issue 80 by dsallings: addq is not quiet
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=80
This appears to be a documentation bug.
The quiet commands are intended to not respond for nor
Comment #2 on issue 80 by killme2008: addq is not quiet
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=80
But in text protocol,there is no response even if the data with key is
existed,when
you use add with "noreply" option.Addq is equals to text protocol "add
nore
Comment #3 on issue 80 by dsallings: addq is not quiet
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=80
That is correct. It was a design flaw in the text protocol we corrected in
the
binary protocol.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of thi
Comment #4 on issue 80 by trond.norbye: addq is not quiet
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=80
It is easy to ignore the response in your client if you want to, because
the response packet contains the
command id so you _know_ it is a response for a addq command (and that is
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #4 on issue 1 by trond.norbye: Memcached installation steps for
Drupal
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=1
This request doesn't belong in our bug database, but rather in Drupals
documentation.
--
You received this message becaus
Comment #2 on issue 74 by trond.norbye: configure script incorrectly
identifies sparc v9 as little endian, selecting incorrect hash function.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=74
FYI, I tried this on a T5240 running Solaris 10 with gcc 4.4.0 and Sun
Studio 12 without any
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 77 by dsallings: Spurious failures on the OpenBSD
builder
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=77
This fix has been pushed.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or becau
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 80 by dsallings: addq is not quiet
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=80
Clarified the documentation.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this iss
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: dsallings
Comment #2 on issue 76 by dsallings: The spec file is not up to date
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=76
I pushed an issue_76 branch for a fix that will generate the .spec when the
tree
version is set (from revision
Comment #3 on issue 74 by mjhostetter: configure script incorrectly
identifies sparc v9 as little endian, selecting incorrect hash function.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=74
FWIW I previously sent a patch against 1.4.0 to fix incorrect reuse of the
ac_cv_c_endian variab
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 74 by dsallings: configure script incorrectly
identifies sparc v9 as little endian, selecting incorrect hash function.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=74
I was not able to build an automated test that fails this (without
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #1 on issue 45 by dsallings: Command line option to disable flush
command
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=45
No. We should make a protocol extension allowing arbitrary AAA rules and
let people
sort this out as best fit in their
Status: Started
Owner: trond.norbye
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low
New issue 81 by trond.norbye: ASCII get could be simplified
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=81
process_get_command declares an array of 201 elements (804 bytes) that we
memset to zero each time we ente
Comment #1 on issue 81 by trond.norbye: ASCII get could be simplified
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=81
Proposed patch in http://github.com/trondn/memcached/tree/mget_stat_count
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or
Comment #3 on issue 76 by judessaux: The spec file is not up to date
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=76
Thank you for a so fast handling of this issue.
The fix proposed by James works great for me, and I'm glad to see it in
your git tree.
--
You received this message bec
Comment #5 on issue 74 by robert.coles: configure script incorrectly
identifies sparc v9 as little endian, selecting incorrect hash function.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=74
I've been trying to recreate the issue.. and no joy.. it was a colleague
who did the initial
Comment #6 on issue 74 by dsallings: configure script incorrectly
identifies sparc v9 as little endian, selecting incorrect hash function.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=74
Great. There is an issue with configure caching, so it's possible that
running
configure twice
Status: WontFix
Owner: trond.norbye
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low Maintainability
New issue 85 by trond.norbye: Superfluous calls to fcntl to get/set
no-blocking mode
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=85
On systems using BSD sockets the socket returned by accept inherits
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 86 by phy...@gmail.com: function assoc_delete may not work
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=86
When delete item, assoc_delete need to rebuild h_next for related keys.
However, I think the existing code for
Comment #1 on issue 86 by dsallings: function assoc_delete may not work
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=86
Can you supply a test for this?
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may
Comment #3 on issue 86 by phy...@gmail.com: function assoc_delete may not
work
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=86
Sorry. I can not supply a test. The reason is that this happens only when
hash has
collisions. I can not find such hash keys at the moment.
But I read the
Comment #2 on issue 86 by phy...@gmail.com: function assoc_delete may not
work
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=86
Sorry. I can not supply a test for this. The reason is that this case
happens only
when hash has collisions. However, I can not find such caces.
--
You re
Comment #4 on issue 86 by xiedeping: function assoc_delete may not work
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=86
Good question. I was puzzled by these codes yesterday. However, they are
right. Let
me explain this, please.
Assumme the item which should be deleted is "key_item",
Comment #5 on issue 86 by phy...@gmail.com: function assoc_delete may not
work
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=86
Thanks very much for your explanation. I misunderstood the func
_hashitem_before,
which I thought it return &(&before_item).
--
You received this message
Comment #2 on issue 62 by dorma...@rydia.net: Patch: connection queue
simplification
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=62
Your change will cause clients to occasionally block on the pipes, I'm
pretty sure?
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #6 on issue 86 by dorma...@rydia.net: function assoc_delete may not
work
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=86
Reporter misunderstood some of the hash table code, closing.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the ow
Comment #3 on issue 62 by dmitry.isaikin: Patch: connection queue
simplification
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=62
Yes, in case of many simultaneous connections.
Client connections is accepted by the listening thread. Pipe is used only
for resend
client information to
Comment #4 on issue 62 by overflow5: Patch: connection queue simplification
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=62
I'd rather send a pointer to the CQ_ITEM over the pipe instead of the whole
struct.
That would increase the number of connections that can be on the pipe and
Comment #5 on issue 62 by dmitry.isaikin: Patch: connection queue
simplification
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=62
Unnecessary copying of 20 bytes of data on the stack is more fast than
dynamic memory
allocation + mutex locking. Size of sending struct may be decrease t
Comment #6 on issue 62 by overflow5: Patch: connection queue simplification
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=62
I agree with removing the connection queue and the locking.
I was a little concerned about sending 20 bytes through a pipe that can
lead to odd
things like readi
Comment #7 on issue 62 by dmitry.isaikin: Patch: connection queue
simplification
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=62
Sorry, I misunderstood).
Yes, partial reading may be a problem. I insert abort() for this case.
Struct is writing atomicaly to the pipe. So libevent would
Status: Started
Owner: trond.norbye
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 87 by trond.norbye: binary cas does not return the new cas id on
success
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=87
instead 0 is returned in the response header.
--
You received this message becau
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 84 by dsallings: binary quitq doesn't close the
connection...
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=84
This has been pushed.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or becau
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 87 by dsallings: binary cas does not return the new cas
id on success
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=87
Pushed Trond's change which includes many other tests.
I also specifically modified the perl binary protocol tests
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 88 by vli...@veus.hr: Problems building on Centos 5 due to
embedding a directive within macro arguments
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=88
Trying to build memcached 1.4.0+ on Centos 5 i386 yields follow
Comment #1 on issue 88 by seth.johnson: Problems building on Centos 5 due
to embedding a directive within macro arguments
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=88
I had the same issue on CentOS 5 x86_64.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fi
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 83 by trond.norbye: Refactor: use htonll or ntohll if
the os provides them
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=83
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or
Status: Accepted
Owner: trond.norbye
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low Performance
New issue 89 by trond.norbye: "optimize" stats counters for mget
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=89
We used to have two counter (one for hits and one for misses) we
incremented when proc
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #1 on issue 89 by trond.norbye: "optimize" stats counters for mget
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=89
Patch:
http://github.com/trondn/memcached/commit/e84042e876739d5d675c4da83820b1c316beca38
--
You received this message because you
Comment #2 on issue 59 by trond.norbye: Fencepost issue.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=59
Looks good, but could you also just nuke the item_init() function? It's
just a waste of time (they are already set to
0)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the
Status: Started
Owner: trond.norbye
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low Usability
New issue 90 by trond.norbye: RFE: generic config parser
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=90
We need a function to parse key=value configuration options/files in order
to let the different
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
