Yo,
-m doesn't take units, and apparently doesn't error if you give it a bad
string.
> b'limit_maxbytes': 67108864,
Sadly, it's gone to its default of 64 megabytes of memory. Sorry about
that :(
try: "-m 64000" - you should be able to confirm with 'ps' that you're not
using the memory as-is.
Hi Dormado,
Thanks for your prompt feed-back.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
dormando wrote:
> Seems like this is a borderline use case, but it might still work for
you.
>From what I read on the internet, it looks like we are miss-using the
tool ... but on the other hand I don't
Seems like this is a borderline use case, but it might still work for you.
How did you verify you found the cause? Can you share snapshots from
"stats items" and "stats slabs" output after your test was run?
Memory isn't evenly distributed; it's assigned where objects actually
exist. so either
Hi,
I am completely new to memcached but it looks like the right tool for what
I need to do:
I would like to do temporary storage of some data coming from a detector at
a pretty high data-rate and share them with other computer via memcached.
The image size varies from 512x512 to 4096x4096
