eeds.
> > >
> > > We're not too concerned about misses since we need to back
> enrich/compare against data that has already been ingested.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Rob
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 17,
t;
> In almost all cases these days TCP will do fine or better, especially for
> large set requests. What's your use case for doing huge UDP sets?
>
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2018, alireza sanaee wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have recently played with the UDP protocol in memcached and I
for
large set requests. What's your use case for doing huge UDP sets?
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018, alireza sanaee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have recently played with the UDP protocol in memcached and I realized that
> multipacket set requests in UDP protocol is not implemented!! I also read
&
Hi,
I have recently played with the UDP protocol in memcached and I realized
that multipacket set requests in UDP protocol is not implemented!! I also
read this thread and it just makes me sure that it is not implemented at
all. Actually, I was wondering about the reasons for this issue?! why
Thoughts?
> >
> > Rob
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 2:22 PM, dormando <dorma...@rydia.net> wrote:
> > Not sure how active this list is anymore :P
> >
> > Are any of you still listening users of the UDP pro
gt;
> > Rob
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 2:22 PM, dormando <dorma...@rydia.net> wrote:
> > Not sure how active this list is anymore :P
> >
> > Are any of you still listening users of the UDP protocol? If so,
> mind
> > reaching out
not too concerned about misses since we need to back enrich/compare
> against data that has already been ingested.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Rob
>
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 2:22 PM, dormando <dorma...@rydia.net> wrote:
> Not sure how active this list is anymore :P
>
&
rma...@rydia.net> wrote:
> Not sure how active this list is anymore :P
>
> Are any of you still listening users of the UDP protocol? If so, mind
> reaching out to me (here or privately) to explain your use case?
>
> I'm thinking around some long term options with it; one is to turn
Not sure how active this list is anymore :P
Are any of you still listening users of the UDP protocol? If so, mind
reaching out to me (here or privately) to explain your use case?
I'm thinking around some long term options with it; one is to turn it into
a compile flag, and another is to keep
About the usage of the opaque field:
For my Erlang Memcached client (binary protocol only) I send multiple
requests in batch over one TCP connection. I use the opaque field as a
requestid; when I receive responses back from the server, I lookup
those opaque values in a table and send the replies
Hi,
I am working on developing a memcached client for binary UDP protocol.
Now after I send out a packet, I need to check whether the response
received from server is for the current request.
Should I use opaque or request Id ?
Whats the use of opaque ? I assume opaque will also be copied
11 matches
Mail list logo
