Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
> Well heck, I was just hearing on the radio today how the prius I think
> is rated at 48mpg city, and 30 something highway. Also, take into
> account there is no official govt testing to rate hybrids so they go by
> what the car maker tells them.
Are you sure about th
manual, if anyone is
interested.
Tom Potter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:41 AM
To: mercedes@okiebenz.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1966 200D, 110 Chassis
In a message dated 10/20/2006 12:33
In a message dated 10/20/2006 12:33:36 P.M. US Mountain Standard Tim,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Besides Marshall anyone have any experience with the 110 chassis and the
200D. I looked at one today, very little rust at all, owner who is the 3rd
has done alot of work. Car has 100,000 mile
The old MB diesels got excellent milage at the expense of, well,
leisurely, performance -- meaning DON'T pull out in front of a heavy
truck. In todays market, that won't sell cars. Newer cars should
be getting much better milage. We had an old Nissan Sentra for a work
car for a while (un
leb C. Striplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1966 200D, 110 Chassis
Isnt it amazing how old MB diesels get as good if not better than the so
called gas savers these days?
Loren Faeth wrote:
R
ow old MB diesels get as
good if not better than the so
called gas savers these days?
AMEN!
- Original Message -
From: "Kaleb C. Striplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1966 200D, 110
, October 21, 2006 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1966 200D, 110 Chassis
Isnt it amazing how old MB diesels get as good if not better than the so
called gas savers these days?
Loren Faeth wrote:
Rust can be a problem. The area behind the front wheels behind the
fender
liner panel is a p
Isnt it amazing how old MB diesels get as good if not better than the so
called gas savers these days?
Loren Faeth wrote:
Rust can be a problem. The area behind the front wheels behind the fender
liner panel is a place where dirt and gravel accumulate and cause
rust. In the rocker panels
Rust can be a problem. The area behind the front wheels behind the fender
liner panel is a place where dirt and gravel accumulate and cause
rust. In the rocker panels and the back end of the rocker panel ahead of
the rear wheels are other areas subject to rust. The trunk wells on each
si
Did you look under the floor mats? Also, check for rust down in the
"pockets" next to the hood hinges; and if you have the opportunity, take off
the covers over the "boxes" to the rear of and under the front fenders and
check for rust. Those cars can have a "lot" of hidden rust.
'66 200Ds ha
Mine has 3-400k on it. I only put on 100K or so. Yes, I put a factory
short block in it in 1973.
Loren
66 200D
66 200D 2.4
et al
At 03:06 PM 10/20/2006, you wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 03:31:08PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Besides Marshall anyone have any experience with the 110 ch
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 03:31:08PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Besides Marshall anyone have any experience with the 110 chassis and the
> 200D. I looked at one today, very little rust at all, owner who is the 3rd
> has done alot of work. Car has 100,000 miles all gauges work, original
>
Besides Marshall anyone have any experience with the 110 chassis and the
200D. I looked at one today, very little rust at all, owner who is the 3rd
has done alot of work. Car has 100,000 miles all gauges work, original
radio works. Needs some door seals, an rear window seals. interior in rea
13 matches
Mail list logo
