Re: [MBZ] No torque (was 72 250 no vacuum advance)

2005-08-20 Thread Mike Boerner
George, There is another ignition failure mode that's intermittent, but I don't think it's your problem. You may want to note it for future reference. High ambient temperature operation, any speed, the engine shuts off, as if you'd turned the key off. Do NOT change the fuel pump first, like I did

Re: [MBZ] No torque (was 72 250 no vacuum advance)

2005-08-19 Thread Mike Boerner
George, are you certain your float level is set to spec? and that the float valves open and there are no dead spiders in there (don't ask why I would check there, but I found a dead one inside the valve once. sounds like low/no fuel. do the accel pump jets squirt fuel when you open the throttle?

Re: [MBZ] No torque (was 72 250 no vacuum advance)

2005-08-19 Thread 72benz250
No black smoke. Mike Boerner suggested it might be the float. I'll be checking that tonight. Any other suggestions? Thanks George -- Original message -- > George, how did the exhaust look? Were you getting any black smoke with > the car under load? I just wonder if y

Re: [MBZ] No torque (was 72 250 no vacuum advance)

2005-08-19 Thread Russ Maki
George, how did the exhaust look? Were you getting any black smoke with the car under load? I just wonder if your ignition system has troubles other than spark timing. Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I moved the vacuum from retard to advance, RPM's are at 1800 at idle and 52' @ 4500

Re: [MBZ] No torque (was 72 250 no vacuum advance)

2005-08-19 Thread 72benz250
Hey Jim, when I wrote "Then she stalled. took quite an effort to get her going again" I meant rolling not starting. She started fine. Put into drive and would either stall right away or when I started driving. Now I tried going up my driveway with with advance, no advance/retard and w/ retard.

Re: [MBZ] No torque (was 72 250 no vacuum advance)

2005-08-19 Thread JFreezn
In a message dated 8/18/2005 6:41:32 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I moved the vacuum from retard to advance, RPM's are at 1800 at idle and 52' @ 4500 RPM w/Advance just like the manual states. Took her out for a spin. Everything was great until I reached the f

Re: [MBZ] No torque (was 72 250 no vacuum advance)

2005-08-19 Thread 72benz250
ndrik - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mercedes mailing list Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 11:10 AM Subject: [MBZ] No torque (was 72 250 no vacuum advance) Hi all, I moved the vacuum from retard to advance, RPM's are at 1800 at idle and 52' @ 4500 RPM w/Advance just

Re: [MBZ] No torque (was 72 250 no vacuum advance)

2005-08-19 Thread Hendrik Riessen
: Friday, August 19, 2005 11:10 AM Subject: [MBZ] No torque (was 72 250 no vacuum advance) Hi all, I moved the vacuum from retard to advance, RPM's are at 1800 at idle and 52' @ 4500 RPM w/Advance just like the manual states. Took her out for a spin. Everything was great until

[MBZ] No torque (was 72 250 no vacuum advance)

2005-08-19 Thread 72benz250
Hi all, I moved the vacuum from retard to advance, RPM's are at 1800 at idle and 52' @ 4500 RPM w/Advance just like the manual states. Took her out for a spin. Everything was great until I reached the first stop. Then she stalled. took quite an effort to get her going again. I think because