Allan,
The AMA does not represent the majority of doctors, that's why our current
president went to them for support on his healthcare bill...to give us the
taxpayers the appearance that the medical community supported this legislation.
Nor do most CPA's support keeping the tax code
I second that. Motion carries. [in committee speak nothing further will
be heard ;)) ]
We the People have been out shouted by We the Committee, who have been
given voice by we're the news. Thus the perception that the committee
rules. They do not. We the People vote with our wallets, not our
: Re: [MBZ] OT: Medical Records: was Light Reading of crash data
Good point. I studied the VA system while devising my own. Just as the old
DOS system for computers worked, but was slow and cumbersome the current
VA system handles patient information equally as poorly.
Bill Gates [you might
PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: Medical Records: was Light Reading of crash data
I second that. Motion carries. [in committee speak nothing further will
be heard ;)) ]
We the People have been out shouted by We the Committee, who have been
given voice by we're the news. Thus
Scott Ritchey ritche...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Holy smokes! I just finished reading Anthem by Ayn Rand. It was one
of
the free Kindle books I downloaded wo check out my wife's kindle.
Opens your eyes and makes you rather sick at the same time. Follow up with:
http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html
: Medical Records: was Light Reading of crash
data
Message-ID: 23F81274AAEC4645BF1DC4037B4D6395@ScottPC
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii
Sounds like Betamax: a better solution but the market (in this case the
Gvt) went a different way.
___
http
TYVM,,, I'm still open to donations.. ;)) Happy money... how much is
that btw?
Actually, it is still a viable system plan, if you happen to know any
investors with enough staying power to place it on the market, please feel
free to collect a finders fee..
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:16 PM, OK Don
Grant wrote:
Actually, it is still a viable system plan, if you happen to know any
investors with enough staying power to place it on the market, please feel
free to collect a finders fee..
Aren't there tech incubators that push this type of stuff forward?
mao
I've been that design by committee route on projects. It never went well
to the end result that kept the vision of the project in focus. Thanks for
the thought.
Things that work well are conceived by individuals and produced by
individuals who are driven and are drivers, in my experience. Because
BTW the medical records at VA hospitals have been computerized for a very, very
long time. Having worked at all kinds of hospitals as a surgical resident I can
tell you that accessing a VA patients records was a breeze. In a regular
hospital it was a nightmare. The drawback of the VA system is
Good point. I studied the VA system while devising my own. Just as the old
DOS system for computers worked, but was slow and cumbersome the current
VA system handles patient information equally as poorly.
Bill Gates [you might remember him] streamlined the DOS system [over time
at least] and made
Mountain Man maontin@gmail.com writes:
Grant wrote:
Actually, it is still a viable system plan, if you happen to know any
investors with enough staying power to place it on the market, please feel
free to collect a finders fee..
Aren't there tech incubators that push this type of stuff
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012, at 03:12 PM, Mountain Man wrote:
Plus, we don't need to go see these information gatherers. Abe
Lincoln didn't have an exposure problem - stay away from the systems
and try to accomplish anonymity as much as possible - forget the
regulators and their schemes. Yes, that
What we need is the ability to share simple data such as diagnosis and current
medications so that doctors can communicate regarding care. Does no favors to
our system when a doc orders a ct that the patient had last month cause it's
easier then getting the result from another doctor. Same
Allan wrote:
Was just reading that contact with our health care system is the fifth
leading cause of death in this country.
Eh...
Life ain't all its cracked up to be...
Easy to say as I am still breathing and ticker is still doin' its thing...
mao - purely expendable
That would be a GREAT system! Wish someone had paid you happy money for
it, and put it place!
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:46 PM, G Mann g2ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Way back in 2005 I designed and copyrighted a medical file system that had
a patient card which remained with the patient and held the
It seems all medical records must now (or soon) be digital. Is anyone else
concerned about the potential easy and wide-spread compromise for this data
that is supposed to be one of only three (doctors, lawyers, and clergy)
privileged communications?
Scott
-Original Message-
From:
It seems that in the society of Facebook/Twitter/ and Britney / Paris no
panty days privacy has taken the decade off.
It will take a generation of abuse by loss of personal information and
being fired for social media postings before the current society will
once again come to respect the need
Grant wrote:
It will come.. just not in my remaining lifetime... likely..
Plus, we don't need to go see these information gatherers. Abe
Lincoln didn't have an exposure problem - stay away from the systems
and try to accomplish anonymity as much as possible - forget the
regulators and their
Yes, the privacy issues are real, and I don't think are being taken
seriously enough. On the other hand, when my father was being treated for
trigeminal neuralgia (sp?), I took him to six different doctors, due to
referals. I had to fill out the demographic data, medical history, current
issues
Way back in 2005 I designed and copyrighted a medical file system that had
a patient card which remained with the patient and held the entire patients
medical history from birth [potentially]. The attending Dr. would have
access to the patients medical record and be able to see any previous
21 matches
Mail list logo
