Re: [MBZ] OT: for GM 3.8-liter V-6 fans (Mitch? Snook?) asybu3aj

2012-06-05 Thread Dan Penoff
Boatloads of these things down here. Very popular with the blue haired crowd. Dan Alex Chamberlain apchamberl...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Rick Knoble rickkno...@hotmail.com wrote: Copied from a post by Esq. Snook. As far as cheap reliable cars from GM, I would

Re: [MBZ] OT: for GM 3.8-liter V-6 fans (Mitch? Snook?) asybu3aj

2012-06-05 Thread Dan Penoff
For that matter, the inlaws have a couple of Buicks. Hers is pretty plain, but Dad's is something really nice, like a Lucerne or something. I wouldn't mind driving it - it is a nice car. Dan Dan Penoff lwb...@yahoo.com wrote: Boatloads of these things down here. Very popular with the blue

[MBZ] OT: for GM 3.8-liter V-6 fans (Mitch? Snook?)

2012-06-04 Thread Alex Chamberlain
Looking at a '99 Bonneville SSE for a friend. Nice clean one owner car, everything works. This has the normally aspirated Series II 3800. According to Wikipedia a bunch of these were recalled for cooling system problems due to Dex-Cool, and there's also an issue with cracking plastic intake

Re: [MBZ] OT: for GM 3.8-liter V-6 fans (Mitch? Snook?)

2012-06-04 Thread Randy Bennell
On 04/06/2012 12:28 PM, Alex Chamberlain wrote: Looking at a '99 Bonneville SSE for a friend. Nice clean one owner car, everything works. This has the normally aspirated Series II 3800. According to Wikipedia a bunch of these were recalled for cooling system problems due to Dex-Cool, and

Re: [MBZ] OT: for GM 3.8-liter V-6 fans (Mitch? Snook?)

2012-06-04 Thread Dieselhead
I thought the 3800 GM was supposed to be the best (GM) engine ever. Or was that an older version without prastic intake and timing sprockets? On 04/06/2012 12:28 PM, Alex Chamberlain wrote: Looking at a '99 Bonneville SSE for a friend. Nice clean one owner car, everything works. This has

Re: [MBZ] OT: for GM 3.8-liter V-6 fans (Mitch? Snook?)

2012-06-04 Thread Mitch Haley
Dieselhead wrote: I thought the 3800 GM was supposed to be the best (GM) engine ever. Or was that an older version without prastic intake and timing sprockets? From what I can remember Counselor Snook saying, it was a good engine to begin with, got modernized out of reliability, and then they

Re: [MBZ] OT: for GM 3.8-liter V-6 fans (Mitch? Snook?) asybu3aj

2012-06-04 Thread Rick Knoble
Copied from a post by Esq. Snook. As far as cheap reliable cars from GM, I would suggest any of the W body cars with the 3800 engine or the 3.1L engines. I would avoid the 2.4 liter engines in the smallest GM cars. The W body cars are the Grand Prix, Monte Carlo, or Olds Cutlass Supreme.

Re: [MBZ] OT: for GM 3.8-liter V-6 fans (Mitch? Snook?) asybu3aj

2012-06-04 Thread Alex Chamberlain
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Rick Knoble rickkno...@hotmail.com wrote: Copied from a post by Esq. Snook. As far as cheap reliable cars from GM, I would suggest any of the W body cars with the 3800 engine or the 3.1L engines.  I would avoid the 2.4 liter engines in the smallest GM cars.  

Re: [MBZ] OT: for GM 3.8-liter V-6 fans (Mitch? Snook?) asybu3aj

2012-06-04 Thread Rick Knoble
Sweet! Very helpful. Thanks, Rick. Alex You're quite welcome. Rick ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To

Re: [MBZ] OT: for GM 3.8-liter V-6 fans (Mitch? Snook?)

2012-06-04 Thread Allan Streib
Dieselhead 126die...@gmail.com writes: I thought the 3800 GM was supposed to be the best (GM) engine ever. Or was that an older version without prastic intake and timing sprockets? It's a very good one, certain models were fitted with less-than-reliable parts, Snook would be able to tell you