Re: [MBZ] OT Follow the Science!

I’m way more environmentally conscious than my Tesla driving friends. They recycle when it’s convenient whereas I go out of my way to recycle, and then they criticize me for driving a diesel or challenging the demented man’s executive order to halt keystone pipeline Sent from my iPhone >

Re: [MBZ] OT Follow the Science!

Curt, you forgot to include this part of their disclaimer: PMC is a repository of content primarily from two sources: peer reviewed journals that overall have met NLM’s standards for PMC ; and peer reviewed author manuscripts deposited

Re: [MBZ] OT Follow the Science!

Since it's Earth Day you have to recycle at least one (1) aluminum can. On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 8:55 AM Max Dillon via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > Ok then, thanks for the critiques. > > Am I banned yet? > > Max Dillon > Charleston SC > > > Apr 21, 2021 10:41:02 PM Buggered

Re: [MBZ] OT Follow the Science!

Ok then, thanks for the critiques. Am I banned yet? Max Dillon Charleston SC Apr 21, 2021 10:41:02 PM Buggered Benzmail via Mercedes : > Dr. Boy, a Fellow in Pulmonary Critical Care at Stanford, says “Yeah this has > been completely debunked and this guy claimed he was affilialiated with >

Re: [MBZ] OT Follow the Science!

Thanks for that clarification, Curt. For the sake of compliance, let’s leave the discussion at that. -D > On Apr 21, 2021, at 8:10 PM, Curt Raymond via Mercedes > wrote: > > From the disclaimers page: "PMC is not a publisher and does not publish > journal articles itself. Once a journal as

Re: [MBZ] OT Follow the Science!

From the disclaimers page: "PMC is not a publisher and does not publish journal articles itself. Once a journal as a whole has been accepted for inclusion in PMC, NLM does not judge the quality of individual articles and relies on the scientific publishing process to identify and address

Re: [MBZ] OT Follow the Science!

This is not appropriate for the list. Take it to Okietalk. There will be no further warnings. -D/ListMom > On Apr 21, 2021, at 6:48 PM, Meade Dillon via Mercedes > wrote: > > And finally here is a study from our government, the NIH, which concludes: > "The existing scientific evidences

[MBZ] OT Follow the Science!

And finally here is a study from our government, the NIH, which concludes: "The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block