Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative forms of voter franchise on

Larry, Here in WA you can sort of read in to become a lawyer. Only good here though. You apprentice to a school taught lawyer and take the bar exam, then you get to be one of the slimy fish. No chance of reciprocity in other states, but good enough for doing country lawyer work. As for

Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative forms of voter franchise on

youroil.net 800-583-8601 Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs - Original Message - From: "Wonko the Sane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mercedes Discussion List" Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 7:43 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative forms of voter fran

Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative forms of voter franchise on

Wonko the Sane wrote: > The only reason they exist is because they are allowed to appear before > the Court, where you and I aren't (unless we are in criminal court and > decide to represent ourselves). In many cases only a licensed attorney can represent a corporation, sometimes an officer of the

Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative forms of voter franchise on

I lost all respect (sorry, Donald) for attorneys when I saw my attorney and my ex's attorney sitting at a cafeteria table and laughing it up over cups of coffee during a recess of my divorce proceedings. They weren't protecting anyone's interests -- they were simply parroting what was already laid

Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative forms of voter franchise on

Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 05:37:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Curt Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative forms of voter franchise on To: Diesel List Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hear hear! Idiots like Brittany Spea

Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative forms of voter franchise on

a sliding cost scale, first one is free, second is $10,000 and the price doubles for each one thereafter. Might make people think it through a little more. -Curt Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:07:51 -0400 From: "Bill R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative for

Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative forms of voter franchise on

Ok Don wrote: "Marriage is a legal contract regarding property, Snook - am I close?" Practically speaking that is pretty accurate. Marriage was, of course, a practice that was solely governed by ecclesiastical (church law) law. It has since been governed by civil law and it does seem that the

Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative forms of voter franchise on toforms of marriage

I was going to respond, but OK Don said it better, I think. BillR -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitch Haley Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 3:43 PM To: Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative forms of voter

Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative forms of voter franchise on toforms of marriage

It's all about property - who gets what when one of the pair dies, which offspring inherit what and when. If there were no property issues, then Government wouldn't care (unless it is a religious State, in which they care about EVERYTHING). Marriage is a legal contract regarding property, Snook -

Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative forms of voter franchise on toforms of marriage

Bill R wrote: > My marriage to my Darling Wife isn't affected at all by theirs, I just want to know why government ever got involved in marriage in the first place. We got along for thousands of years without government meddling in marriages. I think that marriage is one of those rights reserved

Re: [MBZ] Orelegated alternative forms of voter franchise on to forms of marriage

< Royce wrote <> I'm not familiar with the wording of the recently passed legislation -- does it specify "2 people" ? or can it be 3,4,5 or more? What about father marrying son, daughter or the family dog? Many of those things do go more than a bit beyond sanity, though the