Re: [MBZ] Plane Crash for Roger - Spoiler Alert!

2013-01-01 Thread Craig
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 17:01:29 -0800 clay monroe wrote: > Damage assessment and survivability did show the claim by builders of > no differences between walking away of being dead depending upon > seating, are bogus. The educated and well paid are going to die. The > business worker will be hurt,

Re: [MBZ] Plane Crash for Roger - Spoiler Alert!

2013-01-01 Thread clay monroe
Damage assessment and survivability did show the claim by builders of no differences between walking away of being dead depending upon seating, are bogus. The educated and well paid are going to die. The business worker will be hurt, but able to work once insurance pays off. The booger eating

Re: [MBZ] Plane Crash for Roger - Spoiler Alert!

2013-01-01 Thread Dan Penoff
I watched this when it aired. I was disappointed. Just as with the NASA attempt to remote pilot a jet into a "controlled" crash years ago at Edwards AFB, this one failed as well. Most of the program was just a lead up to the actual crash and was pretty boring, IMHO. Dan On Jan 1, 2013, at