If you own a car made in this century, you probably already own a car with a
black box. They have been around a while.
http://www.crashdataservices.net/Vehicles.html
http://www.crashforensics.com/files/CDRVehicleList.pdf
It is interesting that GM was one of the first to use
CDR devices and the
If there were a way to ensure that the data were only made available in
a crash investigation I would not really oppose it. There is something
of a "public good" served in being able to show that a person was
driving negligently and caused an accident, thus making him more likely
to be held respon
This is why my "new" car is from 1985.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Randy Bennell wrote:
>
> However, if you have nothing to hide, it might well save you from
> allegations of wrong doing.
>
> Randy
>
> On 23/07/2013 3:33 PM, Rolf wrote:
>
>> I wont own a car with one.
>>
>> -Rolf
>>
>> On 7
However, if you have nothing to hide, it might well save you from
allegations of wrong doing.
Randy
On 23/07/2013 3:33 PM, Rolf wrote:
I wont own a car with one.
-Rolf
On 7/23/2013 4:28 PM, Randy Bennell wrote:
You might be surprised at how big the market would be.
Randy
On 23/07/2013 3
I wont own a car with one.
-Rolf
On 7/23/2013 4:28 PM, Randy Bennell wrote:
You might be surprised at how big the market would be.
Randy
On 23/07/2013 3:07 PM, Andrew Strasfogel wrote:
That would be for a very limited market.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Randy Bennell
wrote:
On 23/
I was thinking more along the lines of an ability to program the box to
tell the govt that all was well - the seat belts were fastened with care
and the speed limits were being obeyed.
Sort of like the aftermarket O2 sensors that tell the car computer all
is within specs, often used on hot rod c
You might be surprised at how big the market would be.
Randy
On 23/07/2013 3:07 PM, Andrew Strasfogel wrote:
That would be for a very limited market.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Randy Bennell wrote:
On 23/07/2013 1:51 PM, Mitch Haley wrote:
In the Murray incident, the state owns the
On 23/07/2013 1:51 PM, Mitch Haley wrote:
In the Murray incident, the state owns the car, and I would assume,
the data box.
When I own the car, they'll need probable cause to get a search
warrant for my data box. (unfortunately, a lot of judges don't even
seem to read warrants before they sign
A hammer would do it, or any high-voltage source.
--R
On 7/23/13 4:04 PM, Randy Bennell wrote:
One would think there will soon be devices available to re-program
such a black box.
Randy
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okieb
That would be for a very limited market.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Randy Bennell wrote:
> On 23/07/2013 1:51 PM, Mitch Haley wrote:
>
>> In the Murray incident, the state owns the car, and I would assume, the
>> data box.
>> When I own the car, they'll need probable cause to get a search
You should join the ACLU. They are all over this.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Mitch Haley wrote:
> In the Murray incident, the state owns the car, and I would assume, the
> data box.
> When I own the car, they'll need probable cause to get a search warrant
> for my data box. (unfortunately,
In the Murray incident, the state owns the car, and I would assume, the data
box.
When I own the car, they'll need probable cause to get a search warrant for my
data box. (unfortunately, a lot of judges don't even seem to read warrants
before they sign them, so that's a minor formality)
Mitch
Nearly every car being manufactured right now comes with a little added
bonus by way of a tiny recording device nestled under the center console.
And if you're looking to keep your driving habits under wraps, you might
want to start worrying.
As many as 96 percent of the cars mass-produced in 2013
13 matches
Mail list logo
