apchamberl...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 1:05 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Porsche - $975
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Rich Thomas
richthomas79td...@constructivity.net wrote:
Would a 350/700R4 fit in this thing?
http
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Porsche - $975
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Rich Thomas
richthomas79td...@constructivity.net wrote:
Would a 350/700R4 fit in this thing?
http://charleston.craigslist.org/cto/1775932517.html
IIRC that big four is a tight squeeze in the 924/944 already.
Maybe
: Alex Chamberlainapchamberl...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 1:05 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion Listmercedes@okiebenz.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Porsche - $975
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Rich Thomas
richthomas79td...@constructivity.net wrote:
Would a 350/700R4 fit
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Rich Thomas
richthomas79td...@constructivity.net wrote:
I'm think some blown Jap engine and Mustang II front suspension, fat tires,
coffee can exhaust...
Most small Japanese engines are set up for transverse front-drive,
though. How about the flat-six from a
Would a 350/700R4 fit in this thing?
http://charleston.craigslist.org/cto/1775932517.html
--R
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Rich Thomas
richthomas79td...@constructivity.net wrote:
Would a 350/700R4 fit in this thing?
http://charleston.craigslist.org/cto/1775932517.html
IIRC that big four is a tight squeeze in the 924/944 already.
Maybe that GM V-6 meant for longitudinal