I recently sold Dad's 1999 Ranger, 4 cyl, 5 sp, for him - I got 19 mpg
on the hwy at 75. It was sprung so hard, and you sit so high, that I
felt like it was one of the mechanical bulls -- maybe the MBs have
spoiled me? Basically, I hated the thing.
--
OK Don, KD5NRO
Norman, OK
"There are three k
can't have 4x4 and 4cyl
> with a Ford. One of the things I really like about the Chevy is the
> buildablity. You can put just about any engine with just about any trans and
> body style.
>
> Unfortunately the reviews stink...
>
> -Curt
>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 200
3 Jun 2008 16:36:01 -0500
From: Dan Weeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [MBZ] Truck advice
To: mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
I'd have to go with the Ranger, too, with a 4 cyl and 5 spe
I'd have to go with the Ranger, too, with a 4 cyl and 5 speed.
They get the best mileage. THey're just about right for hauling small
loads. And if you have to haul something larger, just add a $600,
3/4-ton capacity Home Depot utility trailer, and you can haul nearly
two tons of stuff, and