# HG changeset patch
# User Anton Shestakov
# Date 1511255021 -28800
# Tue Nov 21 17:03:41 2017 +0800
# Node ID f8e398c42760482f02e6cfb6b8a1e6a752564c95
# Parent ff80efc8f3e469c90376603af4fa39012f328918
# EXP-Topic hgweb-more-info
hgweb: display fate of obsolete changesets
Non-hgweb templat
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 18:14:42 +0800, Anton Shestakov wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Anton Shestakov
> # Date 1511255021 -28800
> # Tue Nov 21 17:03:41 2017 +0800
> # Node ID f8e398c42760482f02e6cfb6b8a1e6a752564c95
> # Parent ff80efc8f3e469c90376603af4fa39012f328918
> # EXP-Topic hgwe
(+boris explicitly to try and get his attention)
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 08:10:14PM +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 18:14:42 +0800, Anton Shestakov wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Anton Shestakov
> > # Date 1511255021 -28800
> > # Tue Nov 21 17:03:41 2017 +0800
Catching back on my emails.
I thought obsfateprinter was not dependent on the template system but I
was wrong. It doesn't seems too hard to make obsfate printer
independent of the templating system.
Just checking that we are all on the same page, should we update the
current obsfateprinter to man
On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 18:49:55 +0100, Boris Feld wrote:
> I thought obsfateprinter was not dependent on the template system but I
> was wrong. It doesn't seems too hard to make obsfate printer
> independent of the templating system.
>
> Just checking that we are all on the same page, should we updat
On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 18:49:55 +0100
Boris Feld wrote:
> Catching back on my emails.
>
> I thought obsfateprinter was not dependent on the template system but I
> was wrong. It doesn't seems too hard to make obsfate printer
> independent of the templating system.
It's not exactly dependent, it's
I have thought about it lately,
What about introducing a intermediary function obsfatedata that would
returns a dictionary with all the raw values.
Something like:
{'markers': [..., ...],
'max_date': (0.0, 0),
'min_date': (0.0, 0),
'successors': ['7a230b46bf61e50b30308c6cfd7bd1269ef54702'],
On Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:00:35 +0100, Boris Feld wrote:
> What about introducing a intermediary function obsfatedata that would
> returns a dictionary with all the raw values.
>
> Something like:
>
> {'markers': [..., ...],
> 'max_date': (0.0, 0),
> 'min_date': (0.0, 0),
> 'successors': ['7a230b
On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 16:50 +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:00:35 +0100, Boris Feld wrote:
> > What about introducing a intermediary function obsfatedata that
> > would
> > returns a dictionary with all the raw values.
> >
> > Something like:
> >
> > {'markers': [..., ...],
On Thu, 04 Jan 2018 09:44:17 +0100, Boris Feld wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 16:50 +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:00:35 +0100, Boris Feld wrote:
> > > What about introducing a intermediary function obsfatedata that
> > > would
> > > returns a dictionary with all the raw va
On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 18:36 +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jan 2018 09:44:17 +0100, Boris Feld wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 16:50 +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> > > On Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:00:35 +0100, Boris Feld wrote:
> > > > What about introducing a intermediary function obsfatedat
11 matches
Mail list logo
