martinvonz added a comment.
I think this patch (and later patches that start using it, of course) would
be a good idea. I suppose it won't make it into 4.8, but we don't have a
freeze, so please send an updated version whenever you have time
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
indygreg added a comment.
New requirements should be documented in `help/internals/requirements.txt`.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4810
To: pulkit, #hg-reviewers
Cc: indygreg, martinvonz, mercurial-devel
pulkit planned changes to this revision.
pulkit added a comment.
Let's do this step by step and get the wireprotocol command reviewed first.
Once that is done, I will resend this one.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4810
To: pulkit,
pulkit added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> martinvonz wrote in repository.py:22-24
> I'm not sure I understand what this says.
>
> The first sentence sounds too obvious to mention (kind of like "when it's
> done, it should be working well"), but I suspect you mean something else. Do
>
martinvonz added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> repository.py:22-24
> +# When ellipses and shallowing is finalized and the UI is done, there are no
> +# more edge cases where things don't work. This should be generalised to
> shallow
> +# or ellipses
I'm not sure I understand what this
pulkit updated this revision to Diff 11501.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4810?vs=11493=11501
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4810
AFFECTED FILES
mercurial/repository.py
CHANGE DETAILS
diff --git
pulkit created this revision.
Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-devel.
Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.
REVISION SUMMARY
Right now there is no good way to check whether a repo is ellipses enabled or
not. This patch introduces a ellipses repo requirement which will be used in
