On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 04:17:05AM +0100, Ian L McLoughlin wrote:
Why do primality tests run to the full value of the integerFor any
iteration surely if an exponent is found within the test it should be
reported and the program aborted?.Not being a maths buff...
Perhaps you're referring
Simon Burge wrote:
I'll let you know of some results soon.
My early tests on a 200MHz UltraSparc are not that encouraging.
./MacLucasUNIX -C -S 10 141
speed: 10 iters in 1.668 seconds, 0.167 iters/sec (fft len 128k)
speed: 10 iters in 1.688 seconds, 0.169 iters/sec
When I leave my computer alone and let Prime95 run, it will
repeat the same second per iteration amount (.209 for M741)
for the most part. However, for about 2000 to 3000 iterations,
it will increase. Sometimes it only goes to .214 or .256, but
I've seen it as high as .544. What's going
for the most part. However, for about 2000 to 3000 iterations,
it will increase. Sometimes it only goes to .214 or .256, but
I've seen it as high as .544. What's going on? It must be
It might be some scheduled service working.
How often is it happening or was it a one-time observation?
Hi:
Simon Burge wrote:
Will Edgington wrote:
(The 49% CPU usage is because my computer was also doing a long term
ecm3 run, including during the FFTW tuning.)
I recommend to use tunefftw when the system is bored, i. e. when no
other idle programs like mprime or ecm3 are runnig, it
One more idea--virus scanners.
_
Unsubscribe list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
