[Sun Oct 10 16:37:44 1999]
Self-test 448 passed!
[Mon Oct 18 07:56:26 1999]
Iteration: 2390772/9008231, ERROR: SUM(INPUTS) != SUM(OUTPUTS),
6.646378947096065e+016 != 6.638737981499106e+016
Possible hardware failure, consult the readme file.
Continuing from last save file.
[Mon Nov 08 17:42:12 1999
Hi all,
Mprime version 19.1 is now available. The only new feature of any consequence
is a solution to the error 2250 some users of the staticly linked mprime
suffered. The whatsnew.txt file describes the line you need to put in
primenet.ini. You must create the primenet.ini file.
Many thanks
Bill Rea wrote:
> >On my Ultra-5 with a small 256Kb L2 cache I get 0.58 secs/iter
> >for MLU against 0.78 secs/iter for Mlucas at 512K FFT.
I wrote:
> These timings suggest that it's more than a cache size issue - after
> all, Mlucas has a smaller memory footprint irrespective of the CPU,
> and
Thanks to Paul Novarese, I have a new Mlucas binary for Alpha/Linux:
ftp://209.133.33.182/pub/mayer/bin/ALPHA_LINUX/Mlucas.tgz
Paul pointed out to me that the old binary was not statically compiled,
i.e. needed separate RTL files, in disagreement with the documentation
in my README file. The cod
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 9 12:10:09 1999
>
> >On my Ultra-5 with a small 256Kb L2 cache I get 0.58 secs/iter
> >for MLU against 0.78 secs/iter for Mlucas at 512K FFT.
>
> These timings suggest that it's more than a cache size issue - after
> all, Mlucas has a smaller memory footprint ir
On 9 Nov 99, at 4:20, Sturle Sunde wrote:
> > perhaps conditional compilation, with each binary incorporating
> > only the routines it needs for that length, could reduce the code
> > footprint and help performance
>
> It can help if it makes it possible for the compiler to eliminate jumps
> an
On 9 Nov 99, at 14:42, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> The problem seems to be that mprime is compiled to glibc 2.1, while RH 4.2
> uses... libc5? glibc 2.0? glibc 2.1 (even in static version) needs some
> special files to operate. This has been discussed on the list before, and
> perhaps it's time
After much anticipation and delay (well, maybe not anticipated because I
didn't tell many people about it), Prime95Setup is available. If you'd like
to take a few minutes and help test it and make comments/suggestions, I'd
appreciate it. You can download it (for now) at:
http://www.mindspring.c
On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 12:08:30AM -0500, jim barchuk wrote:
>I haven't been reading this list lately. I did receive email on Oct 10
>that V19 was avail, and it is 'faster,' so natually I picked it up. It
>dropped in and appeared to work fine. BTW I use the static version because
>dynamic programs
