Hi all,
The
mersenne.org and entropia.com IP address has changed again.
At Brad's request, I'm letting all of you know so that you can report
any
problems to him. Hopefully there will be none.
Regards,
George
From: Brad Bernard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'George Woltman'" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi Benny...
My system behaved in the same way as yours after I installed "Zone
Alarm", a freeware firewall, on my system. I had failed to configure the
firewall to allow prime95 through, and had failed to configure it to pop up
a notice of the denied attempt. So, perhaps you installed a fir
I need help in understanding this post!
Thanks And Best Wishes,
Stefanovic
Yvan Dutil wrote:
> A list a very couragous guy.
>
> 5362403 D 62 4756266 711.6 -11.8 31.2 15-Apr-00 19:32 04-Jul-98
> 00:30 tp68spa
> 5447983 D 62 4948807 697.8 -41.8 18.3 11-Apr-00 21:52 17-Jul-98
>
> From: Brian J. Beesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On 14 Jun 00, at 4:49, Paul Leyland wrote:
>
> > It's a pity that a similar procedure isn't known for ECM,
> or at least not
> > known to me.
>
> Isn't the point that ECM finds numerically small factors much more
> easily than it finds num
Manual testers will be pleased to know that the PrimeNet
manual test forms appear to be working once again.
Thanks, Scott et al.
-ernst
_
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ -- h
A list a very couragous guy.
5362403 D 62 4756266 711.6 -11.8 31.2 15-Apr-00 19:32 04-Jul-98
00:30 tp68spa
5447983 D 62 4948807 697.8 -41.8 18.3 11-Apr-00 21:52 17-Jul-98
20:48 S02147
5633231 62 4915200 648.3 -10.9 15.1 28-Apr-00 17:18 05-Sep-98
08:04 t_taufer
On 14 Jun 00, at 4:49, Paul Leyland wrote:
> It's a pity that a similar procedure isn't known for ECM, or at least not
> known to me.
Isn't the point that ECM finds numerically small factors much more
easily than it finds numerically large factors? Therefore, if a
"reasonable" amount of trial
> From: Brian J. Beesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> If P-1 does find a factor which is compound, then running P-1 again
> with smaller limits will eventually recover a smaller factor. These
> extra runs will obviously take less time than the original
Indeed, and with care one can usually cho
On 12 Jun 00, at 23:20, Eric Hahn wrote:
> I was wondering if it was common practice (ie: the norm) for
> P-1 to take the product of two or more factors when giving out
> a found factor, if two of more factors are found?
I don't know about "common practice", but P-1 uses GCD to find the
facto
I had assigned
Test=9398971,64
but yet it is not in my personal account report. And it is not assigned to
anybody in the
Assigned Exponents Report 14 Jun 2000 09:02
I hope finish this exponent in two days. Did what happen with it?
Best regards,
Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
A Coruña (España)
[EMA
Once a factor has been logged for an M-candidate, either by P-1
or by "the other" method, what M-happens? Is a different sort
of double-checking automatically done?
I've forgotten what GIMPS or PrimeNet do in this regard, but all
Mersenne factors sent to me - and George Woltman and sev
I was wondering if it was common practice (ie: the norm) for P-1
to take the product of two or more factors when giving out a found
factor, if two of more factors are found?
Yes, if both factors are "smooth" enough, they could be found as their
product, rather than individually. "Smo
12 matches
Mail list logo
