Hi,
I've been trying to contact to Mersenne list to change my subscription since
a week ago. There is no way to contact to www.scruznet.com host. Is there any
problem?. Must we update the links?.
Thanks.
Guillermo.
--
Guillermo Ballester Valor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Granada (Spain)
Whats up with this exponent I checked out yesterday, the factor bits = 0 on
my individual account report page & in my work to do file.
6810631 D* 0
DoubleCheck=6810631,0,0
Thx
Shane
_
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www
On Sun, 14 Oct 2001 19:57:36 -0400, in Mersenne_mailing_list you
wrote:
>I understand why AMD did this, at
>least they have been relatively honest (that is, conservative) in choosing
>their "equivalent P4 cpu speed" number.
Hi!
Just to say that the number is _not_ a 'Pentium4 rating', but a
'T-b
> Maybe we're not understanding what is meant by "microcode"... The only CPU
I've designed was a 4-bit system that didn't use microcode to get it's work
done (it was for a class), so I can't claim direct experience, but I at
least thought I knew what the word microcode implied... a level of
abstra
First, the point about XP running on a 286 if it were optimized... I was being
facetious. Didn't think people would take me literally. That being said, I'll modify
that and say it could run on a *386*. :)
Maybe we're not understanding what is meant by "microcode"... The only CPU I've
designe
> Well, I suppose RISC is about as close as you can get to
> that. Microcode, for reasons best known to someone
> familiar with CPU design, is not something
> you can just reprogram on the fly...
I beg to differ. As someone who has written megabytes of microcode,
including an entire IEEE floa
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 03:36:39PM -0700, Matthew Ashton wrote:
>I've heard that before, and always from Outlook users. It seems to be a
>bit of a bug in how outlook interprets the pgp signature.
>
>(Is this any better?)
If there's still a problem, try
set charset="iso-8859-1"
in your .muttrc f
