As of 943b2d52bf5, layout(binding) on an atomic would fail the assertion
here.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes
Cc: Ian Romanick
---
src/glsl/link_uniform_initializers.cpp | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/glsl/link_uniform_initializers.cpp
b/src/glsl/link_u
Chris Forbes writes:
> As of 943b2d52bf5, layout(binding) on an atomic would fail the assertion
> here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes
> Cc: Ian Romanick
Tested-by: Carl Worth
(That is, on my Intel laptop this patch fixes all the regressions I saw
on 10.1 and otherwise passes all piglit test
On 04/12/2014 12:44 AM, Chris Forbes wrote:
> As of 943b2d52bf5, layout(binding) on an atomic would fail the assertion
> here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes
> Cc: Ian Romanick
> ---
> src/glsl/link_uniform_initializers.cpp | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff -
