On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
> On 07/05/2016 08:57 PM, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, July 05, 2016 15:47:45 Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>> > In bc4e0c4 (vbo: Use a bitmask to track the active arrays in
>> vbo_exec*.)
>>
>> > we stopped looping over all the attributes and
On 07/05/2016 08:57 PM, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
On Tuesday, July 05, 2016 15:47:45 Rob Clark wrote:
> In bc4e0c4 (vbo: Use a bitmask to track the active arrays in vbo_exec*.)
> we stopped looping over all the attributes and resetting all slots.
> Which exposed an issue in vbo_exec_bind_arra
On Tuesday, July 05, 2016 15:47:45 Rob Clark wrote:
> In bc4e0c4 (vbo: Use a bitmask to track the active arrays in vbo_exec*.)
> we stopped looping over all the attributes and resetting all slots.
> Which exposed an issue in vbo_exec_bind_arrays() for handling GENERIC0
> vs. POS.
>
> Split out a h
In bc4e0c4 (vbo: Use a bitmask to track the active arrays in vbo_exec*.)
we stopped looping over all the attributes and resetting all slots.
Which exposed an issue in vbo_exec_bind_arrays() for handling GENERIC0
vs. POS.
Split out a helper which can reset a particular slot, so that
vbo_exec_bind_a