On Monday, April 06, 2015 09:44:07 PM Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 11:37:08AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > On 04/06/2015 08:33 AM, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:22:13PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:06:50PM +030
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 11:37:08AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 04/06/2015 08:33 AM, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:22:13PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:06:50PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:46:16AM -0
On 04/06/2015 08:33 AM, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:22:13PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:06:50PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:46:16AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
While this change is correct, the Intel g
On 04/04/2015 11:48 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> This was using the wrong extension, ARB_stencil_texturing
> doesn't mention any changes in this area.
Right... that extension only enables reading the stencil value from a
GL_DEPTH_STENCIL texture. This patch is
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick
> Signed-of
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 12:05:56PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Pohjolainen, Topi
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:22:13PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:06:50PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 0
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Pohjolainen, Topi
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:22:13PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:06:50PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:46:16AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> > > While this change is correct
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:22:13PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:06:50PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:46:16AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > > While this change is correct, the Intel guys will yell at you, because
> > > they're somehow
This was using the wrong extension, ARB_stencil_texturing
doesn't mention any changes in this area.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
src/mesa/main/teximage.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/main/teximage.c b/src/mesa/main/teximage.c
index 8d9d7cf..36e0b
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:06:50PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:46:16AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > While this change is correct, the Intel guys will yell at you, because
> > they're somehow misusing this in meta for Broadwell, s.t. this will
> > cause crashes when
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 08:46:16AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> While this change is correct, the Intel guys will yell at you, because
> they're somehow misusing this in meta for Broadwell, s.t. this will
> cause crashes when blitting stencil. IMHO that's a problem that should
> be fixed in their dr
While this change is correct, the Intel guys will yell at you, because
they're somehow misusing this in meta for Broadwell, s.t. this will
cause crashes when blitting stencil. IMHO that's a problem that should
be fixed in their driver and this can go on, but... it's also not my
driver that's crashi
This was using the wrong extension, ARB_stencil_texturing
doesn't mention any changes in this area.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
src/mesa/main/teximage.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/main/teximage.c b/src/mesa/main/teximage.c
index 8d9d7cf..36e0b
12 matches
Mail list logo
