On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> > While we're at it, we also add support for the possibility that the
> > indirect is, in fact, a constant. This shouldn't happen in the common
> case
> > (if it does, that means NIR f
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> While we're at it, we also add support for the possibility that the
> indirect is, in fact, a constant. This shouldn't happen in the common case
> (if it does, that means NIR failed to constant-fold something), but it's
> possible so we shou
On Dec 15, 2015 12:30 AM, "Abdiel Janulgue"
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/10/2015 06:23 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > While we're at it, we also add support for the possibility that the
> > indirect is, in fact, a constant. This shouldn't happen in the common
case
> > (if it does, that means NIR failed to
On 12/10/2015 06:23 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> While we're at it, we also add support for the possibility that the
> indirect is, in fact, a constant. This shouldn't happen in the common case
> (if it does, that means NIR failed to constant-fold something), but it's
> possible so we should hand
While we're at it, we also add support for the possibility that the
indirect is, in fact, a constant. This shouldn't happen in the common case
(if it does, that means NIR failed to constant-fold something), but it's
possible so we should handle it.
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp
