total instructions in shared programs: 8013221 -> 8010869 (-0.03%)
instructions in affected programs: 475925 -> 473573 (-0.49%)
helped:2350
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h | 3 ++
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_nir.cpp | 81 ++
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> total instructions in shared programs: 8013221 -> 8010869 (-0.03%)
> instructions in affected programs: 475925 -> 473573 (-0.49%)
> helped:2350
> ---
Patches 1 and 3 have been reviewed, but I'm this one has
I wanted patch #1 to land, so I took a look at this one :)
Matt Turner writes:
> + if (brw->gen >= 6) {
> + /* Bit 15 of g0.0 is 0 if the polygon is front facing. */
> + fs_reg g0 = fs_reg(retype(brw_vec1_grf(0, 0), BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_W));
> +
> + /* For (gl_FrontFacing ? 1.0 : -1
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I wanted patch #1 to land, so I took a look at this one :)
Thanks! :)
> Matt Turner writes:
>> + if (brw->gen >= 6) {
>> + /* Bit 15 of g0.0 is 0 if the polygon is front facing. */
>> + fs_reg g0 = fs_reg(retype(brw_vec1_grf(0,
Matt Turner writes:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> I wanted patch #1 to land, so I took a look at this one :)
>
> Thanks! :)
>
>> Matt Turner writes:
>>> + if (brw->gen >= 6) {
>>> + /* Bit 15 of g0.0 is 0 if the polygon is front facing. */
>>> + fs_reg g0
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Or maybe I'm just wrong and some bit is guaranteed to be set?
>
> A "This negation looks like it's safe in practice, because bits 0:4 will
> surely be TRIANGLES" comment seems fine with me.
Thanks, will do. R-b?
I realized I was looking at V
Matt Turner writes:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>> Or maybe I'm just wrong and some bit is guaranteed to be set?
>>
>> A "This negation looks like it's safe in practice, because bits 0:4 will
>> surely be TRIANGLES" comment seems fine with me.
>
> Thanks, will do. R-b?
