On Wed, Feb 04 2015, Matt Turner wrote:
> Is there some reason we should do this as a separate patch instead of
> just squashing it?
Not really. I've just squashed it, (while also fixing the space before
the parenthesis---I should probably add a pre-commit check for those to
help me break that hab
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Carl Worth wrote:
> The user can put the cache directory anywhere, so it's not safe to use
> fixed-size arrays to store filenames. Instead, allocate the cache
> pointer itself as a ralloc context and use that to dynamically
> allocate all filenames.
>
> While making
The user can put the cache directory anywhere, so it's not safe to use
fixed-size arrays to store filenames. Instead, allocate the cache
pointer itself as a ralloc context and use that to dynamically
allocate all filenames.
While making this change, simplify the error handling in cache_get
with a