On 12/12/14 11:46, Timothy Arceri wrote:
Signed-off-by: Timothy Arceri t_arc...@yahoo.com.au
---
Its been just under 5 years since the required version
of GCC was set at 3.3.0 at the time it was 7 years old.
I'm proposing bumping it to 4.1.0 which is almost 9 years
old since its used
On 2014-12-14 08:45, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 12/12/14 11:46, Timothy Arceri wrote:
Signed-off-by: Timothy Arceri t_arc...@yahoo.com.au
---
Its been just under 5 years since the required version
of GCC was set at 3.3.0 at the time it was 7 years old.
I'm proposing bumping it to 4.1.0 which
On 2014-12-14 09:22, kallisti5 wrote:
On 2014-12-14 08:45, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 12/12/14 11:46, Timothy Arceri wrote:
Signed-off-by: Timothy Arceri t_arc...@yahoo.com.au
---
Its been just under 5 years since the required version
of GCC was set at 3.3.0 at the time it was 7 years old.
Signed-off-by: Timothy Arceri t_arc...@yahoo.com.au
---
Its been just under 5 years since the required version
of GCC was set at 3.3.0 at the time it was 7 years old.
I'm proposing bumping it to 4.1.0 which is almost 9 years
old since its used in RHEL 5 which is still supported.
For the
