Kenneth Graunke writes:
> On 10/08/2013 10:36 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> We had a fixup for gen4's 3d-layout cubemaps (which, iirc, we'd
>> experimentally found to be necessary!), but while the spec still requires
>> it on gen5, we'd been missing it in the array-layout cubemaps.
>
> Ah, I see it n
On 10/08/2013 10:36 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
We had a fixup for gen4's 3d-layout cubemaps (which, iirc, we'd
experimentally found to be necessary!), but while the spec still requires
it on gen5, we'd been missing it in the array-layout cubemaps.
Cc: "9.1 9.2"
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/08/2013 01:28 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Ian Romanick writes:
>
>> On 10/08/2013 10:36 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>> We had a fixup for gen4's 3d-layout cubemaps (which, iirc,
>>> we'd experimentally found to be necessary!), but while the spec
>>> s
On 10/08/2013 10:36 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> We had a fixup for gen4's 3d-layout cubemaps (which, iirc, we'd
> experimentally found to be necessary!), but while the spec still requires
> it on gen5, we'd been missing it in the array-layout cubemaps.
Ah, I see it now:
>From the Sandybridge PRM, Vo
On 10/08/2013 11:22 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 10/08/2013 10:36 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> We had a fixup for gen4's 3d-layout cubemaps (which, iirc, we'd
>> experimentally found to be necessary!), but while the spec still requires
>> it on gen5, we'd been missing it in the array-layout cubemaps.
Ian Romanick writes:
> On 10/08/2013 10:36 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> We had a fixup for gen4's 3d-layout cubemaps (which, iirc, we'd
>> experimentally found to be necessary!), but while the spec still requires
>> it on gen5, we'd been missing it in the array-layout cubemaps.
>
> I think we didn't
On 10/08/2013 10:36 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> We had a fixup for gen4's 3d-layout cubemaps (which, iirc, we'd
> experimentally found to be necessary!), but while the spec still requires
> it on gen5, we'd been missing it in the array-layout cubemaps.
I think we didn't bother with that patch because