Stephen J Baker wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Jon Taylor wrote:
>
> > > 1. Linux (Unix) and Windows are, by far, the most popular platforms for
> > > Mesa/OpenGL. The GLX and WGL interfaces are very well established.
> > > Nobody will use a Mesa-specific interface instead of GLX/WGL since
> >
Jon Taylor wrote:
|... If the new generic interface can be implemented using a
| dynamic library based system, it would not necessarily have to be
| Mesa-specific. It could be implemented directly or as a wrapper layer
| around the GLX/WGL/etc interfaces, whether those interfaces are
Brian wrote:
|
| Allen Akin's "glean" is a new OpenGL testing framework. I haven't
| had time to try it out yet. It would be nice if someone
| volunteered to test Mesa with glean. You can get it via the
| developer page on the Mesa web site.
I'll be adding tests to glean, but fairly graduall
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Jon Taylor wrote:
> > 1. Linux (Unix) and Windows are, by far, the most popular platforms for
> > Mesa/OpenGL. The GLX and WGL interfaces are very well established.
> > Nobody will use a Mesa-specific interface instead of GLX/WGL since
> > they'd be limiting themselves to Me
On 11-Jun-99 Holger Waechtler wrote:
>> It doesn't detect my MMX capable Celeron.
> Did you specified -DUSE_MMX_ASM ??
Yes, but the latest experimental branch seems to detect it.
> btw: work the (mmx/3dnow) binutil checks in the configure script ??
Not yet, but I'm working on it.
Thomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> However, looking at Make-config, I don't see -DMMX or -DUSE_MMX_ASM
> anywhere, nor in the lower-level Makefiles. Am I missing something?
> We can work around all this by disabling mmx entirely (and I guess we
> won't be missing anything :) but it would be nice to get t
